Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 40392
Docket No. MW-40575
10-3-NRAB-00003-080395

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Sherwood Malamud when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division - ( IBT Rail Conference PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Union Pacific Railroad Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21,1934.
Form 1 Award No. 40392
Page 2 Docket No. MW-40575
10-3-NRAB-00003-080395

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The Claimants are all 47 members of Gang 8564 on August 6 and 7, 2006. The Organization asserts that the Carrier violated Rule 32 (a) and Rule 32 (e) (6) when it failed to provide a meal period between the end of the third hour and the beginning of the sixth hour after starting work. Gang 8564 was working a compressed half, 11.5 hour work days at the time, from 4:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. No overtime hours are associated with the work schedule of the Claimants on these two days.


The Organization concedes that the Carrier provided a meal period for all Gang members. It claims that the meal period was not afforded within the time limit specified in Rule 32. The meal period should have been provided between 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. on both days. The Gang took lunch at 1:30 P.M. on August 6 and at 12:30 P.M. on August 7, 2006.


The Carrier correctly notes that the factual circumstances of this case are governed by Rule 32 (a) and Rule 32 (b). Because the Gang was not working overtime on August 6 and 7, the provisions of Rule 32 (e) (6) are inapplicable to this factual setting. The pertinent provisions of Rule 32 are as follows:



Form 1 Award No. 40392
Page 3 Docket No. MW-40575
10-3-NRAB-00003-080395
(e) When employees are required for overtime service, they will be
accorded subsequent meal periods as specified hereafter:
(6) In the event a meal period is not afforded at the designated
time, the employees will 6e compensated at double their
existing rate of pay from that time until such time as they are
accorded a meal period; there will, however, be no
compounding of the penalty payments provided herein."

The Board concurs with the Carrier's assertion that Rule 32 (e) (6) by its terms applies to overtime service, a factual setting not present in this case. Rule 32 (b) applies. The Carrier admits that the meal period for some members of the Gang was delayed beyond 10:00 A.M. It asserts that they were paid in accordance with Rule 32(b).


The Organization bears the burden of proof. (See Third Division Awards 31230 and 31930. It failed to submit sufficient evidence to establish whether the Carrier failed to pay the Claimants or some of the Claimants in conformance with Rule 32 (b). Accordingly, the instant claim must be denied.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.



                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 2010.