The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Brian Clauss when award was rendered.
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The Carrier notified the General Chairman in a letter dated September 24, 2004 of its intent to contract out work at ". . . 90624 County Road F, South Morrill, Nebraska." The letter described the specific work as: ". . . perform wastewater treatment plant upgrades, install truck loading pads for containment of service track, and install drip pans at tank car unloading facility."
The Organization maintains that this notice of intent to subcontract was insufficient under the requirements of Rule 52(b). A subsequent notice in February 2005 attempted to cure the problem with the September 24, 2004 notice, but it was after the work had begun and, therefore, was irrelevant. According to the Organization, the notice addressed the wastewater treatment upgrades, whereas the work at issue involved containment work. BMWE-represented forces built the original structures and the work was, accordingly, reserved to them.
The Carrier contends that (1) the notice was sufficient (2) the Organization conferenced the matter and (3) the concrete work at issue has a long-recognized history of being performed by contractors. Further, the February 2005 notice is Form 1 Award No. 40410
inapplicable to the instant claim because it was for a system-wide petroleum systems project. It was served on a different General Chairman, and was withdrawn at conference.
The Board carefully reviewed the on-property record, as well as the Submissions of the parties and finds that the September 24, 2004 notice met the Carrier's notice obligations under Rule 52. The Board also finds that the February 2005 notice cited by the Organization is inapplicable to the instant claim.
The Organization described the work at issue as "construct containment bin and pad, remove and dispose of existing pads, remove and replace containment walls." This work is concrete work. In Third Division Award 37353 the Board held that "[t]he ability of the Carrier to contract out concrete work under Rule 52(b) has been upheld in Third Division Award 31730, 31651, 31287, 31172, 31035, 31029, 31028, 30287 and 30262." (Citing Third Division Award 32333.)
Those Awards are not palpably in error and will be followed for this type of work. Accordingly, the instant claim is denied.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.