Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 40772
Docket No. MW-40170
10-3-NRAB-00003-070380
(07-3-380)
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Patrick Halter when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division -
( IBT Rail Conference
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(BNSF Railway Company (former Burlington
( Northern Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside
forces (Sheehy Construction Co.) to perform Maintenance of
Way and Structures Department work (build tank farm/fueling
facility and related work) at Lincoln, Nebraska beginning on
August 24, 2005 and continuing [System File C-06-0100-7/10-060016(MW) BNR].
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier failed to
provide the General Chairman with a proper advance notice of
its intent to contract out said work or make a good-faith effort to
reduce the incidence of subcontracting and increase the use of its
Maintenance of Way forces as required by Rule 55 and Appendix
Y.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1) and/or
(2) above, Claimants F. Fankhauser, D. Gwinner, L. Divoll, J.
Krouse, T. Lyons, C. Wilson, J. Francke, D. Gerken, G. Tjaden,
B. Sullens, J. Scherer, G. Boltz, R. Reimers, W. Brhel and R.
Wall shall now each be compensated at their respective and
Form 1
Page 2
FINDINGS:
Award No. 40772
Docket No. MW-40170
10-3-NRAB-00003-070380
(07-3-380)
applicable rates of pay for an equal proportionate share of the
total straight time and overtime man-hours expended by the
outside forces in the performance of the aforesaid work
beginning August 24, 2005 and continuing."
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On May 24, 2005, the Carrier issued notice to the Organization:
"Subject: Lincoln Yard Fuel Facility
In connection with the on going Lincoln Yard through-put and
capacity improvement project, the Carrier plans to contract out the
installation of a new fueling facility. The new facility will have a new
tank farm, pump house, and fueling platform. The contractor will
be responsible for all dirt work associated with the site preparation
for the installation of these new facilities. The pump house will feed
a new platform on the south side of the yard via new underground
piping. Contractor will be responsible for building 4 - 25,000 gallon
fuel tanks including the construction of full concrete containment
pad systems for the tanks. The contractor will be responsible for
construction of the Pump house, a 40' x 60' steel building on a
concrete foundation, to include the electrical power system, and
Form 1 Award No.
Page 3 Docket No. MW-40170
10-3-NRAB-00003-070380
(07-3-380)
mechanical pumping system consisting of 3 fuel pumps, filters,
piping, valves, meters, and a PLC based system for electrical control
of fuel pumping. Contractor will also install all piping in the pump
house and the underground piping to the fuel platform. All
underground piping will be doubled walled piping laid inside two
1100' x 42" casing pipes that the contractor will bore under the
yard, from the pump house to the fueling platform.
The contractor will be responsible for the construction of the new
platform, it will be a 4 track fuel dispensing facility with capabilities
for lube oil, water, sand, and ther locomotive maintenance materials.
It will be 400' long and 125' wide and will include piling for
structural support and an HDPE liner system for containment of
fuel spills and waste water. The platform will include mechanical
equipment for the issue of tube oil, fuel, water, sand. The contractor
will also install upgraded lighting fixtures at the new platform. This
work will be done in concert with the other upgrades taking place in
the Lincoln Yards over the next several years.
This work may begin as soon as June 8, 2005.
Currently, there is no available Carrier equipment to support these
projects, and Carrier forces are not available to perform this work
even if the equipment were rented or leased. Historically, when
faced with the amount of work that the Carrier is currently facing it
has contracted to supplement its work force on projects like that
herein described. Nevertheless, the Carrier is not adequately
equipped or skilled to handle all aspects of this work[.]"
On May 25, 2005, the Organization requested a conference and noted that
Carrier forces are skilled to perform this work and are qualified to operate rented
or leased equipment that may be needed.
On October 13, 2005, the Organization filed a claim alleging that the Carrier
violated "Rules 1, 2, 5, 29, 55, Note to 55, Appendix Y . . . beginning on August 24,
Form 1
Page 4
Award No. 40772
Docket No. MW-40170
10-3-NRAB-00003-070380
(07-3-380)
2005 and continuing, when the Carrier contracted for the building of the B-2 Tank
Farm in Lincoln, Nebraska."
On November 29, 2005, the Carrier denied the claim stating it was "out of
time limits. Work on the Lincoln B-2 Tank Farm started in July and the
Organization's claim was not received until October 19, 2005."
On January 9, 2006, the Organization appealed the claim and reiterated its
reasons set forth in the claim of October 13, 2005; it provided other details and
references to Awards. As for timeliness, the Organization stated "[t]his is a multiphase project and this is just another phase in the construction of the B-2 Tank
Farm and a continuing violation of the Agreement [.]"
On March 2, 2006, the Carrier denied the appeal reiterating that it was not
timely under Rule 42A and the claim is not a "continuing claim . . . [c]ertainly this
claim has a starting date and a finish date[.]"
The Organization informed the Carrier on April 2, 2007, that the Carrier had
not provided any proof that the work began prior to August 24, 2005: "The work on
the phase of the project identified as the Tank Farm did not begin until August 24,
2005." The Organization filed its claim with the Board on June 25, 2007.
42A provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]ll claims or grievances must be
presented in writing by or on behalf of the employe involved, to the officer of the
Carrier authorized to receive same, within sixty (60) days from the date of the
occurrence on which the claim or grievance is based."
is dated October 13, 2005, and alleges that commencing August 24,
2005, the Carrier used outside forces in violation of certain provisions in the
Agreement. On November 29, 2005, the Carrier denied the claim stating it was "out
of time limits. Work on the Lincoln B-2 Tank Farm started in July, and the
Organization's claim was not received until October 19, 2005."
Contractor forces' hours show that the claimed work commenced on July 21,
2005. Based on the finding that the work began on July 21 and the claim was filed
Form 1 Award No. 40772
Page 5 Docket No. MW-40170
10-3-NRAB-00003-070380
(07-3-380)
on October 13, the Board concludes that the claim was not filed within 60 days from
the date of the occurrence on which the claim is based, and there is inconclusive
evidence to find a continuing violation.
Given the wording in Rule 42A, the claim must be dismissed as untimely.
(See Third Division Award 36605.)
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of December 2010.