NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THE DIVISION


The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Lisa Salkovitz Kohn when award was rendered.


(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:


Form 1 Award No. 40826
Page 2 Docket No. CL-39659
11-3-NRAB-00003-060517
(06-3-517)
mail handling to a non-agreement supervisor or stranger to our
collective bargaining agreement on a continual basis.
(b) That Claimant Guy Varcasia now be allowed 8 hours pay at the
pro rata rate of $137.00 per day for each and every work day (5
days per week), commencing January 18, 2005, until this
violation is corrected.
(c) That in order to terminate this claim, said clerical work must be
returned to employees covered by the TCU/CSXT - North Rules
Agreement.
(d) In order to monitor and administer the TCU/CSXT-North
Clerical Agreement dated June 1, 1999, and in order to fulfill
TCU's contact administrative responsibilities, I am formally
requesting information relevant to the above grievance. Please
provide me a detailed list of specifically which duties were found
to be `either redundant or duplicative duties that have been
eliminated, and which duties have been transferred to position
41301-163, Clerk Typist-Engineering, current incumbent M.
McLaughlin.' Finally, I am requesting all CSX computer records
from the period of January 18, 2005, and continuing daily
thereafter, relevant to duties as outlines [sic] in paragraph (a)
from the following CSX employees: Rick DelPrince (Buffalo),
Ted Goodell (Dewitt), Al Amberg (Selkirk), Mike Redmond
(West Springfield), Chris Lorensen (Selkirk), Ed Martuscello
(Selkirk), and all Road masters within the territory formally
covered by Clerical Position No. 41301-162.
(e) This request is made without prejudice to this claim on behalf of
grievant Guy Varcasia and the union's right to information. If
any part of this request is denied or if the requested material is
unavailable, please provide the remaining items, which the
organization will accept without prejudice to its position that it is
Form 1 Award No. 40826
Page 3 Docket No. CL-39659
11-3-NRAB-00003-060517
(06-3-517)
entitled to all documentation and information called for in this
grievance.
(f) This request is filed in concert with the TCUICSXT-North Rules
Agreement effective June 1, 1999, particularly Rule 21 (a);
Section 2(5) of the Railway Labor Act; NLRB v. Acme Industrial
Co., 385 U.S. 432, 64, LRVI 2069 (U.S. Sup Ct. 1967); and
Steelworkers, v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 46
LRRM 2416 (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1960).
(g) This claim has been presented in accordance with Rule 45 and
should be allowed."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




Effective January 17, 2005, the Carrier abolished Operating Support Clerk Position No. 4B01-162 held by the Claimant. The Claimant was advised of his right to exercise his seniority in accordance with the applicable Rules of the CSXTITCU-North Agreement. The Organization asserts that the abolition of the Claimant's position violated Rules 1, 24 and 40, among others.


The tasks of the position at issue consist of car tracing (company material cars) way billing cars for Roadmasters, notifying Roadmasters on material cars, ordering

Form 1 Award No. 40826
Page 4 Docket No. CL-39659
11-3-NRAB-00003-060517
(06-3-517)

empty material cars via SHIPCSX, updating Customer Service Department in Jacksonville, Florida, on material car status, maintain inventory of all M of W material and equipment cars on the Division, generate purchasing orders, research unpaid invoices, receipting of purchase orders, scrap rail sales - report and waybill scrap cars, maintain and distribute daily and weekly reports to the Division Engineer, the Material Engineer, and the Signal Engineer, daily updates; basic car reporting, production tie report, rail gang report, Division wreck panel report, empty gondola report, and daily phone coverage for Division Engineer, Staff Engineers, Material Engineers, and daily copying, filing and mail handling.


It is the Organization's position that the duties and responsibilities of the Claimant's position were negotiated and placed within the scope of the CBA made effective June 1, 1999. Because this work was governed by a "positions and work" Scope Rule, it could not be removed from covered employees without negotiation and agreement with Organization. The "general" Scope Rule is inapplicable, the Organization asserts.


The Carrier submits that in order to prevail in this Scope Rule dispute, the Organization must prove that the alleged work is reserved exclusively to Clerical employees by specific Agreement. Where, as here, a "positions and work" Scope Rule is in effect, the burden of proof is location-specific, and the Organization must demonstrate that the work was exclusively performed by Clerical employees at the time the "positions and work" Scope Rule took effect. The Carrier contends that the Organization cannot and has not made this showing, because the disputed tasks were not exclusive to the Claimant's position or to the Clerical craft as a whole. The Carrier also asserts that most of these Clerical activities have been rendered unnecessary due to technological advances, such as E-BUSINESS, SHIPCSX, and ORACLE, that have automated many of the tasks, and the few residual tasks, such as the general office duties of receipting unpaid invoices, copying, filing and mail handling, were absorbed by Clerk-Typist Engineering Position No. 41101-163.


It is unnecessary to determine whether this dispute should be decided under the "general" Scope Rule or the "positions and work" Scope Rule, or whether the disputed tasks are exclusively reserved to Clerks under either Scope Rule, or any other Agreement or practice at the location. Instead, the Board finds that the record clearly

Form 1 Page 5

Award No. 40826
Docket No. CL-39659
11-3-NRAB-00003-060517
(06-3-517)

demonstrates that the work at issue has been eliminated, because it was repetitive in nature, automated through E-BUSINESS, SHIPCSX or ORACLE, or absorbed by Clerk/Typist Engineering Position No. 41101-163. Accordingly, the claim must be denied.

AWARD

Claim denied.

ORDER

This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

NATIONAL

By Order of Third Division

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 2011.

BOARD