Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 40834
Docket No. SG-40751
11-3-NRAB-00003-090006
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Lisa Salkovitz Kohn when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad
( Corporation (Metra)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter
Rail Corp.:
Claim on behalf of R. C. Charles, for two hours and 40 minutes
overtime pay, account Carrier violated the current Signalmen's
Agreement, particularly Rules 15 and 17, when it failed to
compensate the Claimant for overtime service he performed on
Friday, November 18, 2005, when called to repair a gate malfunction
at 87th and Pulaski Road on the Oak Lawn Territory. Carrier's
File No. 11-12-536. General Chairman's File No. 104 SW 06. BRS
File Case No. 14016-NIRC."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,1934.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 40834
Docket No. SG-40751
11-3-NRAB-00003-090006
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
The Claimant was assigned to the position of Oak Lawn Signal Maintainer with
regularly scheduled work days of Monday through Friday and regularly scheduled
hours of 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. This was a monthly rated position. The Claimant's
assigned territory encompassed 87th Street and Pulaski Road. On November 18,
2005, a Friday, the second shift Oak Lawn Signal Maintainer did not report to work,
using a personal leave day. At approximately 5:00 P.M., the Carrier was advised of a
broken gate on the Oak Lawn Signal Maintainer's territory. To repair the gate, the
Carrier first sent Signal Maintainer Boatwright, a second shift Signal Maintainer
assigned to a territory adjoining the Oak Lawn territory. Boatwright called for
assistance to complete the work. The Carrier called the Claimant to assist Boatwright.
The Claimant worked two hours and 40 minutes, but
payment of a "call" for performing this work.
The Organization contends that the Carrier violated Rules 15 and 17 by
working the Claimant outside of his regularly assigned hours without paying him for
his work on the call. Rule 17 states, in relevant part:
"CALLS (a) Employees released from duty and notified or called to
perform work outside of and not continuous with regular working
hours will be paid a minimum of two (2) hours and forty (40) minutes
at rate of time and one-half, and when held on duty longer than two
(2) hours and forty (40) minutes, time will be computed on an actual
minute basis and paid for at the rate of time and one-half."
The Organization asserts that this provision entitles the Claimant to be paid for
the November 18, 2005, call.
not receive the additional
However, the Carrier asserts that there was no violation, because Rule 51 does
not require that the Claimant receive additional payment for emergency service
performed outside of his scheduled work hours during his regular workweek, when
that emergency service is performed within the limits of his regular territory. Rule 51
Form 1 Award No. 40834
Page 3 Docket No. SG-40751
11-3-NRAB-00003-090006
governs pay to monthly-rated Signal Maintainers. With respect to overtime, the Rule
states, in relevant part:
"No overtime is allowed for time worked in excess of eight ($) hours
per day on the regularly assigned five (5) days per week the employee
is scheduled to work, nor on the first scheduled rest day (6th day) of
the work week or holidays; on the other hand, no time is to be
deducted unless the employee lays off on his own accord.
On the regularly assigned five (5) days per week the employee is
scheduled to work, ordinary maintenance and construction work will
not be required outside of his bulletined assigned hours. This does not
apply to such travel time or work a Maintainer might run into when in
completing a certain job worked on during the day he might leave his
headquarters or return thereto outside his regular assigned hours.
Monthly rated employees will have Sunday as assigned rest day, if
possible. For service performed on assigned rest day, rules applicable
to other employees of the same class shall apply as provided in Rule 15
and 17.
Such monthly rated employees will not be required to perform
ordinary maintenance or construction on the sixth day of the work
week nor on recognized holidays. For such service rules applicable to
other employees of the same class shall apply as provided in Rule 15
and 17. Only emergency service may be required on such sixth day,
which will be the service necessary to restore the signal system to safe
working order.
Employees covered by this rule who are required by the Carrier to
perform work outside the limits of their territory outside the assigned
hours of their work week will be compensated for such service under
the rules applicable to other employees of the same class as provided
in Rule 15 and 17."
Form 1
Page 4
Award No. 40834
Docket No. SG-40751
11-3-NRAB-00003-090006
The Board finds that the work that the Claimant was called to perform (to
assist another Signal Maintainer originally assigned to repair a broken gate arm
discovered after the Claimant's regular work hours) was emergency service, rather
than regular maintenance. Therefore, the Carrier was not barred by the second
quoted paragraph above from requiring the Claimant to perform the work outside of
his bulletined assigned hours. However, because the work was performed on the
Claimant's territory on his regularly scheduled work
additional compensation under Rule 51.
The Organization's reliance on Rule 15 and Rule 17 in this case is misplaced.
Although Rule 15 states that overtime hours "shall be compensated on the actual
minute basis and paid for at one and one-half times the basic straight time rate," Rule
51 specifically states that for monthly rated employees, such as the Claimant, "No
overtime is allowed for time worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day on the
regularly assigned five (5) days per week the employee is scheduled to work, nor on the
first scheduled rest day (6th day) of the work week or holidays." The specific
provisions of Rule 51 override this genera l overtime provision of Rule 15 in
determining compensation for monthly rated Signal Maintainers. Rule 51 expressly
requires compensation based on Rule 15 and Rule 17 for monthly rated employees
only 1) for work performed on the employee's assigned rest day, or 2) for regular
construction and maintenance work performed on the employee's sixth day, or 3) for
work performed outside the limits of the employee's territory outside of the assigned
hours of their workweek. Rule 51 does not require additional compensation under
Rule 15 and Rule 17 where the work was emergency work performed within the limits
of the employee's territory on one of the employee's regularly assigned five work days
and the Organization identified no other provision that does so. Accordingly, the
claim is denied.
he was not entitled to
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 40834
Page 5 Docket No. SG-40751
11-3-NRAB-00003-090006
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of January 2011.