Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 41524
Docket No. M W-41668
13-3-NRAB-00003-110218
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Richard Mittenthal when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division -
( HIT Rail Conference
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (
(BNSF Railway Company (former Burlington Northern
( Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The discipline (withheld from service by letter dated August 25,
2009 and subsequent dismissal by letter dated October 2'T,
2009) imposed upon Mr. R. Thomas for alleged violation of
BNSF Railway Policy on the use of Alcohol and Drugs and
MOWOR 1.5 Drugs and Alcohol, in connection with charges
that his follow-up test conducted on August 21, 2009 allegedly
revealed the presence of a controlled substance while working
as a track inspector in Dilworth, Minnesota was arbitrary,
capricious, on the basis of unproven charges and in violation of
the Agreement (System File T-D-3598-W/11-10-0024 BNR).
(2) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (1) above,
Claimant R. Thomas shall now receive the remedy prescribed
by the parties in Rule 40(G)."
Form 1 Award No. 41524
Page 2 Docket No. MW-41668
13-3-NRAB-00003-110218
FINDINGS
:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On June 11, 2009, the Claimant was administered a drug and alcohol test. The
Carrier determined that the test was positive for marijuana, in violation of the
Carrier's Rules. Following that positive result, the Claimant entered the Employee
Assistance Program (EAP) and successfully completed the steps necessary for his
reinstatement. On July 23, 2009, the Claimant signed a return-to-duty Agreement
which specified, among other things:
"You have satisfactorily completed the prescribed treatment
program and complied with the requirements of BNSF's Employee
Assistance Program following your violation of the BNSF Policy on
the use of Alcohol and Drugs, dated April 16, 2009. As a condition
of employment, you are now subject to periodic drug and/or alcohol
testing up to five (5) years from the date you return to work. When
a follow-up test is required, you will be notified by proper authority.
Federal (FRA & FMCSA) Follow-Up tests may be conducted under
observed conditions. Prior to returning to active service, you must
contact your supervisor and comply with any other conditions
required as a result of this violation.
Violation of any one or more of the followin14 conditions will subject
you to dismissal
:
Form I Award No. 41524
Page 3 Docket No. MW-41668
13-3-NRAB-00003-110218
More than one confirmed positive test for any controlled substance
or alcohol obtained under any circumstances during any 10-year
period."
On August 21, 2009, the Claimant was required to provide a sample for a follow
up test pursuant to the return-to-work Agreement. The record shows that the
specimen was collected and transferred to the testing laboratory where it was tested in
accordance with established protocols. In accordance with those protocols, a "split
sample" was tested. The test pertaining to the first "split sample" returned a value
four times the threshold level used to indicate a positive test for marijuana
metabolites. The lab then ran a second test on the other portion of the "split sample"
which confirmed the result of the first test. The Carrier's Medical Review Officer
reviewed the results of both tests and determined the test results to be positive.
By letter dated August 25, 2009, the Carrier notified the Claimant to report
for a formal Investigation on September 1, 2009. The Notice of Investigation
specified that said Investigation would be held:
".
. . for the purpose of ascertaining the facts and determining your
responsibility, if any, in connection with your alleged violation of
BNSF Policy on the Use of Alcohol and Drugs; dated September 1,
2003, when your Follow-Up test conducted on August 21, 2009,
revealed the presence of a controlled substance while working as
Track Inspector, Dilworth, Minnesota."
The Investigation was postponed by mutual consent and was finally held on
October 8, 2009. By letter dated October 27, 2009 the Carrier notified the Claimant
as follows:
"This letter will confirm that as a result of investigation held on
Thursday, October 8, 2009 at 0900 at 2nd Floor Conference Room,
801 Main Avenue, Fargo, ND, 58103 you are hereby dismissed
effective immediately from employment with the BNSF Railway
Company for violation of BNSF Policy on the Use of Alcohol and
Drugs, dated September 1, 2003, when your Follow-Up test
Form 1
Page 4
Award No. 41524
Docket No. MW-41668
13-3-N RAB-00003-110218
conducted on August 21, 2009, revealed the presence of a controlled
substance while working as Track Inspector, Dilworth, Minnesota.
It has been determined through testimony and exhibits brought
forth during the investigation that you were in violation of the BNSF
Railway Policy on the use of Alcohol and Drugs, dated April 15,
2009, and MOWOR 1.5 Drugs and Alcohol."
After a thorough review of the record made during the handling of this
dispute on the property, we find that the Carrier presented sufficient evidence to
meet its burden of proof. We cannot say that the discipline of dismissal was
excessive in this instance. Accordingly, the claim will be denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the
that an Award favorable to the Claimants) not be made.
ate identified above, hereby orders
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of February 2013.