|
In support of this contention, the Organization makes mention of three Third Division Awards: 16154 (Ives, 1968), 32707 (Gerstenberger, 1998), and 33396 (Wesman, 1999). While Awards can be found that state that allegations of moral turpitude, such as dishonesty, require a quantum of proof higher than “sufficient evidence,” the overwhelming position of National Railroad Adjustment Board Awards appears to be that “sufficient evidence” is the single standard by which to determine whether a carrier has proven its charge(s) against an employee.
|
|