ARBITRAT:CN AWARD

PJkRTIES ) Consolidated Rail Corporation

TO )
DISPUTE ) United Transportation Union

QUESTION ) The terms and conditions of. an implementing
agreement directed toward consummation of the
AT ) Consolidatod Rail Corporation's acquisition of
control, lease and operation of the property of
ISSUE ) the Detroit Terminal Railroad Company pursuant
to Interstate Commerce Commission Finance Docket
No. 29489.

DISCUSSION: Interstate Commerce Commission ("I.C.C.") Finance
Docket too. 29489, decided on March 10, 1981, concerned the Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Carrier") acquiring-control of the Detroit Terminal Railroad Company ("Terminal Company"). In its Decision and Order the I.C.C. prescribed that protection for employees affected by such transaction would be those conditions which the Cc-mission had previously imposed in New York Dock Ry. - Control - Brooklyn Esstcrn Dist., 36' I.C.C. 60 (19?9), now commonly referred to as "The New Yo-k Dock Conditions."
Pursuant to conditions as imposed by the I.C.C., the Carrier, on behalf of itself and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Terminal Company, served a prescribed 90-day notice upon its employees represented by the United Transportation Union ("~nion" of its desire to initiate negotiations relative to the terms and conditions of an implementing agreement directed toward consu:-Tation of the approved transaction.
The Carrier's notice of intent to negotiate the implementing agreement was served upon the Union by the Carrier in a letter dated April 17, 1981. On that same date, a prescribed notice of intent was placed on employee bulletin boards to notify the affected employees of changes the Carrier anticipated would made on or about July 16, 1981 as a consequence of its operation and control of the Terminal Company. Formal negorirtions between representatives of the Carrier and the Union commenced May 5, 1981, and continued on various dates over a succeeding two-month period of time. Tentative agreement was finally reached between representatives of the parties on June 25, 1981. Final agreement was subject to ratification by the Local Union, the Union submitting that in accordance with its Constitution it was required to submit the proposed agreement to the Local Union. Subsequently, by letter dated 'July 29, 1981, the General Chairman for the Union advised Carricr's Senior Director of Labor Relations as followss






Upon notification of the Union's position relative

to the agreement, the Carrier instituted steps to formally invoke the arbitration provisions of the New York Dock Conditions. Those provisions, in pertinent part, provide as follows:

'APPENDIX III

"4. Notice and Agreement or Decision - (a) Each railroad contemp sting a transaction which is subject to these conditions and may cause the dismissal or Zisplacement of any employees, or rearrangement of forces, shall give at least ninety (90) days written notice ........

'Within five (5) days from the date of receipt of notice .... a place shall be selected to hold negotiations ....and these negotiations shall commence immediately thereafter .... If at the end of thirty (30) days there is a failure to agree, either party to the dispute may submit it for adjustment in accordance with the following procedures:




















"(b) No change in operations, services, facilities, or
equipment shall occur until after an agreement is reached
or the decision of a referee has been rendered."
In implementation of the above arbitration provisions, the parties jointly selected the undersigned to be the neutral referee to finally determine this labor dispute. Formal acceptance of selection as the neutral referee was provided the parties by the neutral referee in a letter dated August 8, 1981.
Thereafter, a hearing on the dispute was held with representatives of the parties to the dispute in Cleveland, Ohio, on August 23, 1981.
An concerns the dispute, it is obvious from a reading of the record that the designated representatives of both parties were satisfied with the agreement they had reached on June 25, 1981. It is an agreement which appears to provide a fair and equitable arrangement to protect employee interests in the transaction. It is evident that all concerned were ably represented by persons experienced in the art of negotiations and familiar with a transaction of the type involved in this dispute.
Accordingly, on the basis of the record, written submissions, and oral presentments by representatives of the parties at the arbitration hearing, it will be the neutral refere*'s determination that the terms and conditions of agreement between the parties be as set forth in Attachment I to this Award. Except as concerns a few points of clarification, which had been explored and discussed at the arbitration hearing, this Attachment tracks the agreement which the parties had reached in direct negotiation.
It is to be noted for the record that Carrier representatives stated the Union would be promptly furnished the names of employees presently on furlough, and that those persons so named shall be considered as protected employees in the application of a Crew Consist Agreement which the parties had entered into under date of September 8, 1978.
In making a decision as above in this dispute, the neutral referee is guided by what he believes :o be a reasonable interpretation of the mandates contained in the I.C.C.'s Order, particularly as concerns representatives of the parties having the principal responsibility for reaching terms and conditions of an agreement which, as here, will provide a fair and equitable arrangement to protect the interests of employees affected by a transaction. Certainly, the Local had a right to invoke its Union Constitutional privileges aid have the matter placed in arbitration. However, it should be recognized that regardless df the amount of time one could spend in negotiating an agreement, no amount of effort will solve or cure all individual worker or management needs or desires. The purpose of collective representation is to entrust individual rights with accredited representatives so as to avoid the pitfalls of bargaining on an individual basis. Thus, the neutral referee has placed great weight upon the fact that the representatives for the Union had indicated acceptance of the agreement, and that for the neutral referee to attempt to arbitrarily change that which had been agreed to would no doubt only lead to further controversy.
AWARD: By virtue of and pursuant to powers vested in
the undersigned by the Decision and Order of
The Interstate Commerce Commission in Finance Docket No. 29489
and the I.C.C. imposition of labor protective conditions as
prescribed in the New York Dock Conditions, it is hereby decided
that the terms and conditions of an implementing agreement
directed toward consummation of the Consolidated Rail Corpora
tions's acquisition of control, lease and operation of the
property of the Detroit Terminal Railroad Company made pursuant
to the above Finance Docket, shall be as set forth in Attachment I
to this Award.

Robert E. Peterson
Neutral Referee

Briarcliff Manor, NY August 24, 1981
ATTACHM._rNT I

AGREEMENT BET1WEEN THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION (CST), THE CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATICN (CONRAIL) AND DETROIT TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH CONRAIL'S ACQUISITION OF CONTROL, LEASE AND OPERATION OF THE PROPERTY OF THE DETROIT TERMINAL RAILROAD COMPANY UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 4 OF THE NEW YORK DOCK CONDITIONS PURSUANT TO INTERSTATE C OMMEPCE COMMISSION ORDER IN FINANCE DOCKET N0. 29489.



2. The territory of Conrail Seniority District "A" and
the "Detroit Consolidated Terminal" will be amended to
include the entire territory of the former Detroit Terminal
Railroad Company. The entire territory of the former
Detroit Terminal Railroad will be included within the
Conrail Detroit Terminal switching limits.

3. (a) On the effective date of. the Agreement the names
.of employees of the former Detroit Terminal Railroad
Company will be added to the bottom of the existing
Conrail District "A" Seniority Roster with prior
seniority rights retained in the Detroit Consolidated
Terminal subject to tho allocation of work as indicated
in Section 9 hereof.






























9. (a) For the purpose of allocating work and deter
mining equity of the employees affected, CnnRail
will furnish the General Chairmen subject
hereto the engine hours operated in the combined
territory during the calendar year 1980, and a lis
of the proposed assignments to be operated in the
Detroit Consolidated Terminal.













In the application of this Item, the General Chairman or his designated representative of the affected Seniority District may exercise his right to select a replacement for the abolished assignment within 72 hours computed from the time the right of selection is afforded or,

In lieu of selecting a replacement as provided in option "i" he may elect within 72 hours to hold his right of selection in abeyance, retaining the
abolished assignment for a period not to exceed thirty (30) calendar days and under this Option "ii" the right of selection shall be restricted only to those assignments available at the time first afforded the option to select replacement under option "i".


















10. A consolidated extra list shall be established to protect
yard vacancies and extra yard service operating within the
Consolidated Terminal. Positions on the extra list will
be advertised and awarded to the senior applicants consisten·

















AT""NCHMENT 'A'

UTU(C&T)
Detroit Consolidated Terminal
Pursuant to I.C.C. Finance
Docket 29489

(Conrail Acquisition of OTRR)

1980 Engine Hours

Conrail

14- 044

89.41


Conrail

DTRR
16,956
10.6%

NYC-Michigan CentraI - 901
PRR - 101


Job Selection List

Job
Selection
Number

Total
160,000
1001

Seniority
District Job

CR-HC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
DTRR
CR-PRR
CR-MC
CR-mC
CR-MC
C R-!i C
C R-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
DTRR
CR-rC
C R-.P R R
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-HC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
DTRR
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-HC
CR-PR
Job
Selection
Number

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45

·6 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 so


ten lority
District

CR-MC

fR-MC R-MC CR-MC DTRR

CR-HC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-PRR CR-MC CR-MC C R-MC DTRR

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-PRR CR-1":C

DTRR

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC C R-.h C CR-MC CR-MC CR-PRR DTRR

CR-MC

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-!:C DTRR

CR; MC
CR-PRR

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC


Pass

Job
ATTDI-HMEV;' '3'
(Conso a t ed Extra L: s L )
UTU(CZT)
Detroit Consolidated Terminal
Pursuant to I.C.C. Finance
Docket 29489
(Conrail Acquisition of D.T.R.R.

1980 Man Hours

Conrail DTRR Total
468,750.0 50,926 519,676
90.21 9.81 1001

Conrail

NYC - Michigan Central = 911 425.836.8 hrs.



JOB SELECTION LIST

Job
Selection Seniority
Number District Name

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27


CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC DTRR

PRR

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC C R-MC CR-MC CR-HC CR-HC C R-MC DTRR

CR-MC CR-MC PRR

CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC CR-MC DTRk

CR-MC
Job
Selection
Humber

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54. 55 56 57 58 59 60


SenirotiY
District

CR-MC
CR-HC
CR-MC
CR-PRR
CR-MC
CR-MC
C R-MC
CR-MC
DTRR
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-PRR
CR-MC
CR-MC
OTRR
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-t!C
CR-MC
C R-MC
CR-MC
CR-MC
CR-PRR
CR-MC
oTRR
C R- HC
CR-MC
CR-MC

402-

Job

NOTEt To the extent necessary, the above Job Selection List is,to'be carried out to Job Selection Number 100 before the Job Selection List is, again repeated.