SPECIAL HOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0.
17
_ Case dal
MEMBERS OF THE HOARD
,
C. E. Wheeler
Organization Member
C. A. Peacock
Neutral Member
Shari E. Cohen
Carrier Member
PARTIES ) Brotherhood Railway Carman of United States anc Canaca
TO
DIZUTE,
) Norfolk and :western Railway ~o.,Ya.;;
OTHER
APPEARANCES%
Organization
Ray Entler
0. Mier
QUESTION FOR
ARBITRATION
s
Carrier
W. L. Allman
Go C. Edwards
Did the Illinois Terminal Railroad Company furlough and
dismiss the following employees in anticipation of being
merged with the Norfolk and '~lestern Railway Company
Employee
G. R. Sirtax, Carman Apprentice
'd.
Strickland, Carman Apprentice
M.
Pine, Carman Painter
C. Lynch, Carman Apprentice
R. Loyd, Carman Apprentice
D. Adams, Carman Apprentice
M.
R, itheeler, Carman
G, Wainer, Carman Apprentice
W. E, Hagen, Carman Apprentice
I. G. Cole, Carman
R. Heilmith, Carman
R. D. Carver, Carman
Date Furloughed
February 21, 1981
February 21, 1981
February 20, 1981
February 21, 1981
February ?1, 1981
February 21, 1981
February 24, 1981
March 1, 1981
March 14, 1981
May
13,
1981
May 13, 1981
August 1, 1981
And
did
the Norfolk and Western Railway Company furlough the follow-
ing mployees in anticipation of merging with the Illinois Terminal
SBA N0.
17
- Case fl
Page two
Employee
S. H.
Plonk, Jr., Carman
8. C. Dunaavant, Carman
J. V. Wellmaker, Carman
R. A. Calasdbetta, Carman
G. L. Campbell, Carman
P. kinder, Carman
A. J. Slipper, Carman
J. S. Whitnell, Carman
V. J. Blond.,, Carman
J. Coleman, Carman
H. H.
Gerard, Carman
Eircma. Carman
x.
D. Lynch, Carman
Date Furloughed
October 30~
It so, should the Norfolk and Western Railway Company be required to
compnts the teat period averages of these employees and apply the benefits
set forth la Article I, Sections 5 through 9 of New York Dock conditions,
Including the elections contained therein.
The agreement establishing this Special Hoard of Adjustment was
signed by the partisan members November 12, 1982. On December 17, 1982
I, C. A. Pwaook, was appointed by the National Mediation Hoard to sit
as Neutral Member of SEA N0. 917.
The Hoard
convened
on Februarg 3, 1983 in Roanoke, Virginia at
rhloh ties the partisan members were afforded 11111 opportunity to pursue
all argmatita relative to their positions, Written submissions had been
asohaagad by mail as previously agreed in Paragraph G of the parties'
Hoveeeber 12, 1982 Agreement.
Haokg:ound discussion by both parties reflected concenaus as to
events leading up to the application riled by the Norfolk and Western
Railway Company in December of 1980, seeking approval with the Interstate
Cameros Camrsiaalon to acquire the assets and equipment of the Illinois
Terminal Railroad. Subsequently, the application for coordination of
operations of NAsyl and IT were approved in finance Docket No. 29455.
SPA N0.
91,2
- Case $1
Page three
Vjdch in part imposed protective conditions for employees commonly
referred to as Nor York Dock II.
Organisation argues that carrier was knowledgeable regarding the
impending take over long before any official action was instituted for
consolidation, and thirteen (13) Carmen were furloughed on October 30,
1978. Further, the IT began furloughing'in February, 1981 and continued
uniil twelve (12) additional men were furloughed, `in anticipation of
the transaction."
Carrier states that no furloughs were made for
any
reason other
than in the interest of economy and efficiency of operation during
rather depressed economic times. Carrier also reminds the Board the
IT Railroad had sustained losses over several years in amounts no small
carrier could absorb and continue to operate as a viable railroad, a
fiat wall publicised in a variety of trade and financial publications.
The question before this Board is simple. Did Carrier in fact
make certain reductions in forces in order to avoid "the protective
conditions commonly referred to as New 'fork Dock II for affected
smployeesto
Ta considering all the ^^=dance and an in depth study and review of
the tcltmtinous exhibits submitted to this Board, the record indicates
that the furlough of the claimants was in the course of normal business
practices exercised in depressed economic times, and not in anticipation
of the transaction.
SEA N0.
17
- Case f1
Page four
DBCISlCtit Question is answered in the negative. Denied.
0
Wheeler
Organisation Member
February
V
1983
C#Xla~c~l
C. A. Peacock
Chairman and Neutral Member
Shari 5. Cohen
Carrier Member