I
u
D E X
Abandonment of Atlanta Joint Terminals ------------------------- 51
Abandonment of joint facility to use ether Carrier's
facility evidence of coordi.^.atio----------------------------- 71
Abandonment of joint facility to use ova service not a
coordination--____-__-__________________-____-__________-_-__
Abnormal test period earnings ---------------------------------
Adverse effect deferred, employee protected -------------------
Adverse effect due to loss of extra work by
regular employee--___-_________________________________--__-
Adverse effect due to reduced traffic account coordination
of other facilities -----------------------------------------
Adverse effect from second cccrdinarion within first
protective periud-_________________________________-__-__-_-_
Adverse effect may result where employee or. furlough
part of year prior to coordination ---------------------------
Adverse effect not caused by coordinativ.^.----------------------
Adversely affected where employee hclds same
position aft=r coordinaticn---------------------------------
Agencies consci:idated, assi?nmezt of employees ----------------
Agreement, Implementing, is not in lieu of WJFA---------------
Agraement required and=.r .Section 5-_--------------------------
Agreement setting up inter-railroad runs not a
Agreement under Section 5 not reached, Carrier's pro
posal made eff=_cove----------_-----------Resubmitted Docket
Agreements, L^ple:aenting (three made at same time
but after merger considered related -------------------------
Allocation of forces bargainable u:~der WJPA-------------------
Allocation of fort?s where no agreamerat reached by the
parties; Carrier's proposal mach affective--Resubmitted Docket
Allocation of percentages in coordinated facility,
Escanaba Yard-________________________-_____________________
"Another available position" does not include ex
cepted positions-__________________________________________-
Anticipaticn of a coordination --------------------------------
Anticipation of a coordination, evidEn=a inconclu
sive (also-see dissent)______________________________________
Appiicatio*dof WJPA not involved where Carrier changes
freight route via other available connections ---------------
Application of 41:FA to coordination of Escanaba Yard ----------
Application of WJPA :here employee not represented by
labor organization ------------------------------------------
Arbitraticn agreed upon in implementing agreement
in lieu of Section
13---_____________________________-_______
Arbitration provided in Oklahoma CoWiticr.s does not dis
place jurisdiction of Section 13 Ce-mittee------------------
Assignment of employees, consolidation of tc.o one-man
agencies --------
Assig:manC of
employees,
o;'ncre no agreement reached Car
rier's proposal ;ride effective --------_---Resubmitted . Docket- 70
Assignment of employcas includes right to agree
on number of cmQlovecs ----------------------------- r----
Docket No.
25,26,28,61,1C'
62,137
52,53
132
103
63,64,103,109,
125,146, i4"7
131,132
89
2
57,70
,C.;
70,98
40
103,109,125
92
63
88
64
Atlanta Joint Terminals an unincorp:ratcd agcncy of
using Carrier; (S e.= FD 18?~,5 TCC Order 5/17,~bO haIding employees of A:: are empl:yeris o^f L&\
,3
------------------- 51
"Attrition." as price of Impla.menting Agream:nt ----------------- 119
"Available pcsition, another," dies not include
excepted position-------------------------------------------- 40
Available position 88 r_ilea ac: ay re.;uires change
of residence--------------------------------------.----------- 67
Available position 118 miles away requires charge
of residence------------------------------------------------- 99
Birmingham, Ala., CGA cork pe.rforme.d by IC when
transferred to SOU is a ecotdination (Decision
in Dockets 47, 51 and 59 overruled) -------------------------- 140
Bison Yard coordi-iatior ----------------------------------------- 119
Bloomington, Ind. transfer of work by C:&1 not
a coordination----------------------------------------------- 16
Buffalo, N. Y. coordination of coal dcck facilities
of LV& DL&W-------------------------------------------------- 23
Carriers' prcp:sal allocating f.)rcas made effective
where agreement not reached---------------------------------- 70,98
Change of crew assignments wher_ inter-railroad runs
established not a coordination------------------------------- 88
Change of residence nut required to avoid forfeiture
of displacement allowance------------------------------------ 58
Change of residence required where available position
88 miles away------------------------------------------------ 67
Change of residence required where available p:,;ition
118 miles away ----------------------------------------------- 99'
Charleston Union Station - withdrawal by 301: and SAL
to use
ownn
facilities not a c)ordinacisn--------------------- 25,26
Cincinnati City Ticket Office Of B&0 closed, result
of Joint action---.-------.------------------------------------ 106
Cincinnati Union Terminal - withdrawal ^f using Carriers
to use o,n facilities not a coordination --------------------- 100
City Ticket Office of B&O at Cincinnati closed and work
transferred to Union Terminal-result of joint action--------- , 106
City Ticket Office of CRI&P at houstcn closed and work
transferred to HB&T was a coordination----------------------- 128
City Ticket Office of CRI&P at Kansas City closed and
work transferred to Unicn Terminal-result of joint action---- 68
City Ticket -Office of PRR at D~troic closed - not result
of joint ction---------------------------------------------- 56
Claim under WJPA not barred by claim to NRAB------------------- 106,122
Closing City Ticket Office of B&O at Cincinnati. and
transfer of ioork to Union Terminal-result of joint action---- 106
Closing Citv Ticket Office of CR:xP at Houston and work
transferred to 1'B&T was a coordination----------------------- 128
Closing City Ticket office Of CRT_&P at Kansas City and work
transferred r-o Union Terminal result of joint action--------- 68
Closing City Ticket Office of PRR at Detroit not a coordina
tion where no showing made joint action was required--------- 56
Closing tower when traffic reduced due co consolida
tion of other facilities-------------------------------------- 132
"Comparable hours" considered in crnLputirg displacement
allowance -------------
-VI-
Compensation of position emplcyce elects to decline ------------
Computing displacement allowance - overtime and
comparable h,urs--------------------------------------------- 65,78
Computing displacement allowance - subsequent changes
in rates not considered-------------------------------------- 9
Conditions imposed by ICC not in lieu of protection of WJPA---- 27,52,53
Consolidation of two one-man agencies, assignment of
employees-------------------.--------------------------------- 89
Coordination, effective date of (Escanaba Yard) -
follows report and decision of ICC-------------------------- 4,14,105
Coordination, effective date of - must first comply
with Section 4 and 5 of W,7PA-------
Coordination, time of ----------------
Coordination, transfer of work by C&cI at Bloomington,
Indiana, not a cocrdination---------------------------------- 16
Coordination, transfer of work by CI&L at New Albany,
Indiana, is a coordination ----------------------------------
Coordination allowance not prorated ---------------------------
Coordination effected when CofGa work performed by IC
employees transferred to SOLT (Decision in Docket
47, 51 & 59 overruled) --------------------------------------
Coordination affected when C&O and N&W tower abandoned and
- functions transferred centrally located joint tower ---------
Coordination effected when
C&EL
work transferred to C&WI------
Coordination effected when DL&h' pa;ssager station in
Buffalo closed and reopened in formrer Erie Yard Office ------
Coordination effected .;hen two DL&W telegraph offices
combined at a former Erie yari office -----------------------
Caordi.nation effected when Wilson, N.C. Tower closed and
work transferred frcm NS to AU -----------------------------
Coordination effected when 3 miles of PE merged into
SP System---------------------------------------------------
Coordination not effected by establishment of inter-
railroad runs or change in. crew assignm=.nts-----------------
Coordination not effected by extension of CTC to
integrated facilities ---------------------------------------
Coordination not effected by transfer of Erie and Wabash
work to C&WI from C&E1 not a party to the coordination ------
Coordination not effected when Erie consolidated two
of its own offices -------------
Coordination not effected when SP-UP cancelled arrangement
with
C&MJJ
and routed passenger trains into Chicago via
CmStP&P ------------------------------------------------------ 47
Coordination not effected when Uni.:n Depot discontinues
performance of switchtend?r service which is taken
over by crews of using trains-------------------------------- 61
Coordination of agencies at Shar·n, Pa.
unilaterally is violation of W-'PA-----------------------------
CoordLnati,:n of coal dock fa:ilities of LV and
DL&W at Buffalo----------------------------------------------
Coordination of facilities of L&A and LA&T-------;--------------
Coordination of facilities of SP and WP at Lathrop,Caiif.------
Coordination of work d>>ne by supervisor covered by
U: W.JP" but nLt proved by clainan~-----._-----------------------
CoordinaLion r-qvir~s joint action, b,; tc:.o or mere carriers ----
Coordination with previously coavdinatcd facility --------------
58
13
4,14,105
140
70
88
69
59
57
23
19,20
22
63
39:554,56,5
60,
Corporate. "wail' Ci;aria>ton ~ni:r Scaticn, o»,ing Carriers will n:t be. required to pr ~tt~cc emplcyees----------------
CTC installed after s·erger of Ci:i cat?: branch of Erie,
held not a coordination for lack of prDzf CT-- and
merger connzcted._____________
_____-_______-_--______-_____-_-
CTC installed after -nerg~r nct s. coordinacior,--------------------
Dallab Yard coordination - C~rrie:rs' prenosal on
allocation of forces made effective where egre.emenc
under Section 5 not reached (also sea dissent) -----------------
Damages for violation of WJPP. ordered full back. p=y
based on 12 month average lass actual uage.s--------------------
Date of coordination - must first c,:mply -with
Sections 4 and 5 of WJPA--__._-_-_-_____-_--_----___--_-__-_---
Date of coordination, (E;canaba Yard; fcllo,_s report
· and de:ision of
ICC--_________________________-______-______---
Date cf cocrdinatio:~ preceding .'Tuns 18, 1963 -
protective benefits not applicable ----------------
Deceased employee, heirs entitled..-------------.
Deferred adverse effect, smpIoye.=, prcte.cted---
Deprived of employment (also see dissent) ------
25,26
64
69
98
106,122,124,1;
130,140,141,1:
15
40
52,53
73,79
Deprived of employm-.-.nt, employee entitled to benefits------------ 37,66
Detroit City Ticket Office of PRR closed, not result
-of joint action-___________________________-__________________- 56
Discontinuance of train; not shown to be result of
coordination-___-___-_______________-____________-__________-__ 41
Displacement allowance, employee entitled to--------------------- 18,21
Displacement allowance, employees on extra list not
entitled (,also see dissent", ------------------------------------ 95
Displacement allowance, employees reverting to extra
list are entitled-__________-___-____________________________-_
Displace·nent allowance, hew computed -----------------------------
Displaceme.r.t allowance, subsequsnc changes in rates
not considered when, computing---------------------------------- 9
Displacement allowance claim not barred by erroneous
pursuit of coordination allowan,~e------------------------------
Displacemsnt allo·.aancs ccmpute.d on basis .of higher
rated job empl,·yee elected to decline ---------_----------------
Displacement allowance. denied fr.r lack of evidence ---------------
Di.splacement allowance due every month in which employee in worse position for 5-year period ---------------------
Displaces,ent allowance due there e.mplaye~ h:-lds
higher rated position ----------------------------------
Displacement ali.o:.=nce net computed on basis of rate
of excepted position to which seniority of claimant does not
entitle
emplcyee--------------------------
Displacement ailcw:nce not f:.rfei.te.d whErF an employee
elects to d<.cli.re posici..:n req·:iring change cf residence -------
Displacenant allowance riot prur-At<,] ------------------------------
Displacec.ent allow:r.ce whare. e:r.pl,yEe holds same
position after coordination --------------------
Displacement allo:::nce. wh>ra test period earnings
abnormally hig?;_._______.__..___________________________________ 62,137
Displacc7ent net caused by c.'rdirati:n---______-__-_________--_- 109
Diversion of business or cr>_ffic evidence of coordination-------- 71
Duplica:~e p=:yn~_-,ts ~indrr bath ICC conditions and
W,iP-'·do not accrue-____.
Farni mss ~,'~:m; m,'_ ;,f ta.r
9,17,127
65,78
40
85,86
62
40
58
127
_________________ 131
Earnings in Tesc Pcricd ;br.ormally htgti-----------------------.
Effective date of coordi.n=Lien, must first c=ply
with Section; 4 and 5 of W=P~------------------------------___- 13
Effective date of co,~rdi.naticn follows report and
decision of :CC (Escanaba .'ard)--:___________-_________-_-_____-
"Elected to decline" available pasiticn--------------------------
"Elected to decline" position °_mploVEe voluntarily
vacated to bid on lc.:ar paid job-------------------------------
40
Election of remedies--_________-._-____________-_________---_____- 106,122
"Elects to decline." position re.qUring chang: of
residence, displacement allcw.ance. not forfeited -------
Eligibility for displacement allowance---------------------------
62,137
Employees regularly assigned vho revert to extra list
entitled to displacement allowance---·-------------------------
Employees assign-.-.d in consolidated facility ---------------------
Employees holding excepted position proca,:ted-_________________-
Erie RR ccnsolidatsd two of its office; rot a coordination ------
Escanaba Yard cocrdinati;,n, application of WJP.1-----------------
Escanaba Yard coordia=ticn, claim of Conductor Porterfield------
Evidence. inconclusive where work transferred from MC
Tower to JAY Tower (also see dissent)-------------------------- . 92
Excepted posi.ti:n, occupant prote.ccs.d---------------------------- 63,C7
Exercise seniority, employee elected net tn---------------------- 79,87
Expenses, moving, do=s not include.
reimbursement
for .
daily mileaga incurred ----------------------------------------- 44
Expenses, moving, employee Entitled to--------------------------- 18
Expenses, moving, not allowad------------------------------------
Extra board
assignment
can qualify as a "position ------------
Extra board assigomsnt not a position (also s=a dissent) --------
Extra employee. assigned to extra board befors and after
coordination
entitled
to displacement allcw3nce---------------- 17,103,108,
109,115
Extra employee whose standing on list affected not en
titled to displacement alto-;ante (also se.e dissent)------------ 95
Extra wz)rk lost by regular employee due. ro'cot-rdination ---------- 121
Facilities already cuordi.n9ced at Ramsey, I11., WJP9
does not apply-__________________________-___________-_________ 45
Failure to reach agreement under Section 5, Carrier's
proposal mad=_ eff=dive---------------------Resubmitted Docket- 70,98
Forfeit of displacement alloc:ance not caused by
failure tdtake job req,_i.ricg charge of residence-------------- 58
Forfeit of sepsrati.on allcwancF w't.ert employee re
fuses to accept regular empl,_,yment ----------------------------- 87
Furlough status at time of ~c.^reir3clon doe; nor
bar eligibility to be.nefits-----------------------------------
FurleugS=_d from vOL'PT te.n mtnt!a after coordination
emplcyee.s entitled t= protection-____________________
Further coordination ---------------------------------
Higher rated position acquired, employee may still
be entitled to displacement all:wanca-------------------------
Hinkle, Ore., LT c:;-:k back work pr~,7i-~usly performed
by REA under contract not a coordination---.__________________--
Housta:l City Tic4;t Office of CR?iP clnse3 -:oint action --------
can ~g:e<^,e_. can be writte.n b:; Sec-13 Committee .--------
Implc:-,_nti _ sgre:T.e.nt cannot rcuuim Carrier agree
to <atriticn prow?sir.-,-_______________________________________-
58
62,65,67,125,1'
131,135,139
9,17,95
89
67
120
4,14
14
5
66,103,108,135
95
103,108,139
52,53
68,106
62
38
128
119
Implementirg Agre.e.menc m.Ddifies W_P.X oe-,e.fits
Implementing agreement. cannot recuire mainten6nze of
minimum m.~?bar of po=_i.tion; in consz;lid=ted
service (also set- di·SP.,lt)--_._-__________-_____-___----______..
Implementing agrearLent. not in
lie1G
of !v--PA -----------------------
Implementing agr:Pm;ent provides ;·=par~tion alio·;ance
where change -,f residence re.cuired-__-______._-__________-_-_--
Implementing Agreements (three made at same. time but
after merger, consid=ered related) ------------------------------
Inter-railroad runs: establL5nmc.rt v^f, nova
a coordinaticn..________-_-________-____...__-_-_________________-
"Involved" in a ccordinati=n------------------------------ ----
"Involved" und---r Sec, 3(b) WJPA where rsilr,:ad
carrier and REA coacerned -------------------------------------- 46
Job protection bey_nd W1:PA cann^t be reqLired as condition
of organization agreeing to implenaancing agreement
(Also see dissent) --------------------------------------------- 90
Joint action by cu:: ::r more carriers required for
coordinati.en--____.______.________-_-_________________________-
Joint action consists of continued :peration of
Union Terminal --------
Joint action not involved when Erie consolidated
two of its offices---_-____________________-_______________-__- 120
Joint action not taken by Cbb'W linen SP-LTP cancelled
arrange.m--nt and routed passenger trains into
Chicago via
CMSLP6P--________________-____.____________._______
Joint action taken whp.n new toner tc.--k over functions
of abandoned C50 and NSW
cowars---___-_-____________________-_-
Joint action when Section 4 notice net given ---------------------
Joint action where officers and direction
of two carriers are same ---------------------------------------
Jurisdiction of Secciorr 13
COmmiLreE.-----------------------------
_._.________________
134
90
2
99
Jurisdiction of Section 13 Comm
a
to=., supervisory
control over arrangement of frrce.s but not over
rates of pay or rules (also see dissent) -----------------------
Jurisdiction of Secci~;n 13 Committee to order Carrier
to give Sec. 4 notice, pay damages, etc .-----------------------
Jurisdiction of Sec. 13 Committee to write Se--.5 Agreement ------
Jurisdiction over int:erpretati.on of implementing agreement -------
Kansas City Tick=.c Office of CkT&P clog.<.d as result of
joint acti$!m-______________________________.,__________________
Lathes - delay of 2 years not a b;r·
Lathrop, Calif., c:ordinacion of facilities of SP b. WP----------- 22
Leased lines camprise single terra.a.r----------------------------- 60
Linndale, Ohio, transfer of work from bYC RR Pig Four
Loss in sale cfh.x:., employA.e enritle.d but n.~t
allowed for lack of pr:,of--____._______________________________ 18
Loss in sale of h-:me n.:t rei.mburseahle under
terms of imple-amtinp. agreement -------------------------------- 134
Loss of p·-,sitiw and unavailability of an-_ther
entitled e:,^plo7:.=. to coordination 311·7c:aeca-------------------- 66
Louisville & "~sh.,ille mcrgFr (Nr
_)L'Pi C.>ncsicinn;)·--__________-____ 105
Mileage incurrc,d daily
"all
n-t be reimbursed-------------------- 44
Monthly alljc..nc·ss not pr~riced ---------------------------------- 127
Moving e.·.pwi;Cs, emp1.-.y..n. r.ntitled
Cc--________-_____-___________
18
-.
88
47,51,59,131,14
N3;10J61~8;6
'
47
48
5771,75,10E
124
25,27,47,52,5:
64,88,106,141
98
106,141,142
70,106
99
Moving Expanses do not include reimb,;rs,~me.nc for
daily mileage in:urrc3--.___-___-______________
Moving expenses not atlo»e.d--_____--___-________
New Albany, Indians trsnsfer rcrk by CT6= to
another railrc-d is a coardLnatt.in------------
New Orleans Union ka:senger Ier:niral cocrdinatlon-------
New Orleans Union Fassenge.t rermi,nal c=ordina.cLon
of REA fscilities-_-_-----__.-_-.-_--______-_____--__________-__-
Ne.w work at new freight terminal n:t c.nstdered
under k'.JPA-_.
New York Harbor, PHR tcck back work previously performed
by LIRR 4ndar contract not a coordinacicn-·---------------------
Norfolk Yard, NT Ry, protective benefits denied for
lack of e.wider,ce----___-___-____________-____-__--__--_______--
Notice of coordination required by Impleme-,ring
Agreement net give.---_-___-____.___-.___________-___-___--__--
Notice required by Section 4 not given---------------------------
44
7
46,52,53
46
Number of eaupl.?yee; in consilid3cE.d facility --------------------
Offer of other position (also see iissent') ----------------------
Official -- s~.e_E:rc_!~ ced
Overtime in tear period and in c:3mputing
Parti.e; to s.
coordination,
employe>_s not covered by W J.PA
if employer not a party (overruled by Docket 140)--------------
Period of preteccion 5 years regardless of employees
service !displaca·ne_t allowance) -------------------------------
Port Norfolk flo=c bridge disconci.nu.=_d by FRR-------------------
Position defined (also see dissent)/ -__________________-________-
Post-coordination. occurrences affecting allowances ---------------
Prior ccordinsci?r--_______________..________________-___.___-____
Prior Joint acti.?n>-.._______-____________________-____-__________
Proof lacking work of two districts coo:soiidated----------------
Proof of cocrdieati.n when Sec,4 n:~cice not given ---------------
Proof required "worse position" teas=.d by coordination----------
Proposa7 of Carrier ail:,.:ating force; made.
effective where. agreement nut reac!-:ed-------------------------- 70,98
Prorating of monthly allowances not intended --------------------- 127
Protective._Itnafits, employee entitled in coordination
of facilities L6A and LA6T______________-______________________ 18,21
Protective benefits of WJPA r.t applicable where
coordination effec=e.d prior t. 'c.^,e 18, 1936------------------- 15
Protective benefits of t.JFA appli=d where patties failed
to reach agreement required by Se.c.S (also see dissent)-------- 90
Protective be.nefi.cs of WJPA unir..p3ited by imposition
85,86
130
45,57,70,106,1:
124,128,130,1
141,142.·.._
89,119
73,79
65,78
47,51,59
133
71
95,108,115
103,109,125,
129,139
45,68
68
63
71
62,64,109,125
27,52,53,6=,'
142
Protective period for disptacemf.nt allowance 5 years regard
less of c-;pl.?vees length of scrvic=_---------------------------- 133
Railway E·:pr-_:s Az=.ncy, W.3p:s app! icable t?-___________-__________ 38,46
Ramsey, Illinois, facilitiPS cc~,rdinacf~d----._-____________-_____- 45
Re.comput;;tir,-, of test period earnings d3e.s
not include 7,.-ar.intc-.n pay-.-:?nee-._.__.___.______________________ 132
Regular c-nloy~. lost cYtra work d,_e to
coordination-- ----------
121
Remedy
d:`:ere.~c, S~'i?d~.l~ agt~c:~t vs IIJFA~.___________________- 106,122
Remedy erroneously pt.r-;ej do :.s r.ot bar claim---____.____
Remedy under W,-PA not. V:rred by claim to N?Af·---------
ReimburseT:ent for daily auto mileAge n:t required
under WJPA ----------------------------------------------------- 44
Return of work (handling
LCL)
to SLSF previously perform=d
by RIFT as result of joint. action is a coordinarLon------------
Return of work to PRR previously performed b,. L=RR
under contract net a coordin5tion-----------------------------
Return of work to UP previously perf5rmeo by BFI
under contract. not a coordination.- ----------------------------
Revert to exera list. account coordination, employee
entitled to displacement allowance ----------------------------
Routing freight. via available connections,
WJPA not applicabla--_-_________-_-___._-_-_---------__-_--_---
"Rules governing working ccnditicns" interpreted -----------------
St. Louis, Ito. return of handling LCL from F.-_Fl to
SLSF as result .f joint action is a cc:rdin:tion--------------
Sale of home, employ=.e entitled to 1:3;s V,;t n·:;t
allowed for ljck of pr·oof--___--___-_____-_-__-_-_--____--___-- 18
Salt Lake City Vni.on Dept, disc..^ntlnuan_e of switch-
tending service and performance of same by crews of
using trains not a coordination -------------------------------
Selection of forces; coordinated facility ac Escanaba Yard ------
Seniority, empl.-·yee elected nor to exercise ---------------------
Separate Carri.er OnereMP and III hale same officers -------------
Separate Carrier where PRR owns 1001 of L:ER Stock --------------
Separate facilities of C&NW not consolida:ed SP-UP can
celled arr>ngemsnt and routed trains via CMScP&P--------------
Separate facilities not consolidated by establishment of
inter-railroad runs or change in ore;: assignments -------------
Separation allawsnce-___--_______________-____---__-_-___-_-__-_-
Separation allowance, employee d:·es not qualify where
he loses positron and is ibla to secure another ---------------
Separation allo·Wance., ert,ployee encicled under special
implementing =greem=_nc--_-___-_-__-__-_--__--_--_-__-__-_--___-
Separation alloc:ance, employee not entitled where after
furlough he failed to return, for comparable work --------------
Separation allowance, employee rat encirled G-hers he
voluntarily left other position -------------------------------
Sep=_ratLon allowance denied f;r lack of eviden^s----------------
Separation.atlo·ance for=eited when°_ employee refused
to aocspt regular employment -----
Severance pay--____-___--_--_-__-____
Sickness of other employees in test oariod not
cause of abrnrmal earnings of zlainanc------------------------
Sharon, Pa., N-N unilaterally coordLr,;t-d agencies with P&LE----
Substitution of o~,n service for joi~,c fa=ilicy not a
coordinati,on--_--__--____-__-__-__--.._-__--___-_.-____-__-----_
Switchtender service, by Union Depot ennployeea taken
over by cre.;.,s of using trains n.t a coordination --------------^ 61
Termination of existing co~,rdicati.·:n not within
protection :f
to:PA~-_-____-________________-..
Test period _ 12 ninth; prFcsdin,; adverse effect ----------------
Test period e-.r-.ings aVnorm=11v
r_gr;-----------------------------
103
106,122
39,14
9,17,95,127
39,54
61
8,14
79,87,101,/
124
110
47
88
66,73,74,79,8
66
99
79
74
85,86
87
66,73,79,87
137
57
25,26,38,61
100,110
25,26,38,61
100,110
103
62,137
JOCK, t _ \ O .
Test period esr^i.-.gs distorted in pr=
coordinatio·: period-_________.___________
Test period earr.i:.gS essential element in
esrabiishing elig"I'lity ------- ------------------------------ 138
Test perind ear:::nx> must be fu-nis'~ca on request--------------- 131
Test period earr,_::gs :,.:t affected by subsequsnE
changes in rates--__________________________-______-___-_-__-- 9
Test period earrings not furnished :r kes tina limit
in implementing agr=esm=eat inapplic?ti..--
Test peri.d e_rnings recomputed, guarantee
payments not ir.cludsd--_________--_______-_..________-________-
Time limit for filing claims not appli:able Vhere
carrier fails to furnish test period earni:gs----------------
Time limit of 1956, agreement rot ==_pplicabla--------------------
Time of coordination ---------------------------------------------
"Time paid for" in test pe.ri.od---___-__________________________Tower centrally located ccr.,tin:ng f,:-ctions of abandoned
C&0 and rSW towers is a ccordinstion under Sec.2(a) WJPA------ 48
Train discontinuance rot shoar. to be result of coordination----- 41
Transfer of C&EI w,rk to C&W=, emploveas proreited -------------- 59
Transfer of work from MC Tower c^. j~A° Tower evidence
held inconclusive ;also see dissent )------------------------·Transfer of work from -NS to ACL whsn Wilson Tower
closed is a =.oardinaticn--_________._____-_________-_________-
Transfe.r of work from one seni_rity district or
leased lire to anither not a coordination ----------- - ------- 60
Transfer of w3rk of Erie & Wabash from G&EI
to C&WI,
C&EI employees not protected because CSEI not a
party to co.=.rdination-________________________________________ 59
"Unable to secure" an-other
positicr:--________________________--
Unilateral act by carrier not a cc,:rdinaticn-------------------Union Stations ahsndsr._.d!ytl=nta
::in=
Ier-rin_ls)--------------Union Statiors obandOTed XRirlpst_a Union Station Co.) --------WJPA claim not tarred by claim to LV$AS-------------------------WJPA not superseded by c~,rditi.^ns imps sad by ICC
under Section 5.,2)(f)
--________-___-________________________-
.____________________,
103,137
Wilson, N.C. To:-er closed aid tem,:tely controlled
from South R._^.k-: Mourt is a crcrdiranon----------------------
Work. never pErfcx;n<.d at old facility rot subject
Work returned to FRR. previously p:rf3rmed by
LIRR under cc.:txact not a coordirtati.Dr ------------------------- 110
Work returned t:. SLSF as a result --f j--int action
with RIFT is a~c._ordiracisn----------------------------------- 39,54
Work returned c.. UP previ=usly pert°.^rmed by REA
under cent-act n_t. a ccordina*-iz7 ------------------------------ 38
"Worse p:;siticn" -..a~>=.d b;· loss of extra
work
by
regular emplo:=.--.______________..____________________________
"Worse position" not result of cryordination---------------------
"Worse positi:)r." result of cocrdiricior-----~-------------------
"Worse" o:-rking con-ii.t:cns affettsd by numb=.r
of ec,plcyC2s i^ :o:rdinated facilicy_____.____________________ 119
138
67,103,122
4,14,105
65,78
92
75
66
56,57,70,71,7:
51
25,26
106,122
27,52,53,64,
141,142
121
62,64,108,10!
146
103,115,121