PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee
 TO ) and
 DISPUTE:) Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company (Southern Region)
 QUESTION Are Albert McDougle and Albert McCune entitled to compensa
 AT ISSUE: tion as provided in Section 1 of Article IV of the Media
 tion Agreement of February 7, 1965, or as provided in
 Section 2 of Article IV of said agreement?
 OPINION The record shows that it was not the practice on the property
 OF BOARD: to bulletin regular positions of the type which Albert
 MeDougle and Albert McCune might have obtained through the
 exercise of their seniority rights; nor is there any showing
 that an extra list existed at the time. Both employees
 worked full time in June, July, August, September and
 October, 1964. Accordingly, we conclude that they hold
 "regularly assigned positions on October 1, 1964" as this
 language is used in Section 1 of Article IV of the February
 7, 1965 Mediation Agreement.
 AWARD

 Albert McDougle and Albert &Gone are entitled to compensation as provided in Section 1 of Article IV of the Mediation Agreement of February 7, 1965.



                          orWashington, D. C.December 19, 1967

                y

                C ~--,~_~


Washington, D. C. - December 19, 1967