PARTIES ) brot_:erhoo:. of Raiivray, -.iri_;:o ~._:d °.,._~.:..____-
..lcr=;s,
*_,_
TO ) Freight F_.idlers, 3y_ess a=.6 SW.,.ic.:
DISPUtn, ) and
dew York, \e4r Haven and l,r_r: ford Company
QUESTIOVS -
AT ISSUE: 1. Did Carrier violate the rrovisions of
_ebruary 7, 1965 agreem-eat :siren; o:
._
st
3i, 1965, it
abolished
the
General
Clc-=:-
Laborar position held by J. J. Zyc:: and refused to thercafte- co:.~,:)2ns<.te i._;a in a~cordance with the
provisions
of Article IV?
2. Did Carrier violate the provisio.^,^,., of the
February 7, 1165 ul.gree::ent 47h2n it dGn1Ed
~u.
Zyck the right to
exercise
displece~:.-.nt
rights to the highest rated position avzilable to him which would not have reouired
a change in residence?
3. Shall Carrier now be required to restore
k1r. Zyck to fully protected straws and
compensate
him in
accordance
wit': the pre-
visions of Article IV, Section 1, for all
wage loss suf=ered following
abolishment
of his position?
OPL\'IOV,
OF BOARD: Despite the confusing mess o= detailed comes?o:cenca in
C1Ud.-d in the instant claim, tie vrsailiCCa'_O:1
5-22k5
t0 have
the'. C1a17C,ant exercise dlSplaCe_.2nt rigstS, a5
Y:.-^..li 2S
re
cover any monetary losses, pursuant to Article IV, Section
, of the oebruary'7, 1905
National
?~r2e:-.~.-t.
Briefly, the facts indicate tl.aC the Carriaz transferred
certain work from various points to a Central billing Dapartrc:t a,
Hew Haven. This necessitated aboi fishing twelve posi tics =.n: esta-Sl,.shirg three new positions at S,:w Haven. The C'_ai^ant's position was one
of those abolish:.-d and instead of bidding for one
of Lae
newly created
positions, h e sou,ht to displace on the Ch fief C1er:C position at Wall-in'ford. In due course, he·was notified of his inability co displace on
that position due to lack o= qua=ifications. However, ac the Ciai.^antS
request, he was given an opportunity to post on _..at pcs_tioa for five
days, without compensation. .?2in, it was datC:m1.'.d t:.at '--- 1_-ckad
the necessary qualifications -- but he
continued,
for a?:ro:·:i.-at-a _;' sit
weeks, to attempt to acquire the ability to
:`-.form --
_;1 ,.o no avail.
,_
In addition, he lacked the. ability t0 ty~-c, a..2CeSSary skill Jn this
- i -
position. Hena2, the instant claim was =;med
O
n t~, e V
J;:
nu _ : _
Claimant was not permitted to displace on the Chief C1e~k-°s position
at Wailingford.
_ ')_
..:....d ':J. _3~
.;.,. C:~-19-E
One of tha ~c~'
^
=o ns posee
._re_·
__.__ __.___ .._.._,._,.
11, Section i ) or t,,:i_ :~2t=.cn 1 re
~-·
~~ C_ - -,. ~- - ' -
J':i y
t _ ,_.,_,
~.'_._ W.~(i _~
UW.
protected
e,:.?loyea
when
he
_<.il2d to cbtai n a pcs-_Lio:; <.:cila;_e to H`-a
in the exercise of his S_iority rig is in accorCC.c~:
.,_L..
e>:i.st_:,C Ovules
or ad-ieer..2ats. lde have ds,_r:~in2d _.. Casa .;_. C~.-27- ...._.rd _:o. 33,
_
_, .
rendered this daze, that
P<uJ.e 45 i,-..: o;_. a _.utua_ oali~ _tio.-. n-
parties o:. the
. iLi3 record reVCa19 that
c.
nil..^,',h2r
Oi yOSiCiGLSy..~rG
aV'._la'Dle
t0 the, C1a 1.'.:ant
4ii11.C:1
n
C
failed
t0
~O}Jv2in. ?n
ai:C.i1:.'_OP,· Ll:..
C1a _..,
-,:I L
was recalled under the Agreecrent for
a
position c: .".; C:-"...r-r at
New Haven, SJhiCv: 112 refused. 1n our view, 'the Carrier ..<.,.-COilp1'iC'd
411C:1
the provisions of the
agreement.
AF1A2D
Answer to questions 1, 2 and 3 is in the negative.
1
-~~ll~_a;~rl ~~,~;~
-<i~L~
:furray~4. Aohman
y'eutra~ T~r.,her
Dated: Washington, D. C.
larch 7, 1969