PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
 TO ) and
 DISPUTE ) Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
 QUESTION
 AT ISSUE: (a) Did Carrier violate and does it continue to
 violate the February 7, 1965 Mediation Agreemant
 when Mr. C. J. Grimm, Signal Maintainer, was not
 recalled to compensated service on the Cumberland
 Division by March 1, 1965?
 (b) Should Mr. Grimm now be recalled to service
 on his home seniority district?
 (c) Should Mr. Grimm now be compensated for any
 loss in wages and allowed travel time, meals and
 lodging expenses for each day corm-zncin.a 'March 1,
 1965, that he is obliged to work on another
 seniority district? Should these allowances be
 made so long as he continues to work on another
 seniority district due to Management's failure to
 recall him to service on his own seniority district
 by March 1, 1965?
 OPINION
 OF BOARD: The issue to be resolved in this dispute is identical
 to that in Award No. 54 (Case No. SG-7-E), and the
 Board is governed accordingly.
 AWARD

 Parts (a) and (b) of the Issue are not in dispute; part (c) is answered in the negative.

                /'w


                    Neutral DIemb


Dated: Washington, D. C
 April 23, 1969