. Award  
J.
 
~. U
Case 
.v3. vV-13-LL
SPECIAL 
BOARD OF ADJUST.%ro-NT- NO. 605
i
' PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
 
TO ) and
!  DISPUTE ) Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
  
QUESTION
1  AT ISSUE:  (a) Did Carrier violate and does it continue to
    
violate the February 7, 1965 t?ediation Agreement
    
when Mr. S. R. Lowry, Assistant iiaintaincr, was
'    not recalled to compensated service on the St. Louis
    
Division East End Seniority District by March 1,
i    1965?
I
1
i    (b) Should. Mr. Lowry be recalled to service on his
    
home seniority district?
    
(c) Should Mr. Lowry now be allowed all travel time,
    
meal and lodging expenses and any wage loss, for each
    
working day commencing March 1, 1965, that he is
    
obliged to work on another seniority district? Should
    
such allowances be made so long as he works on another
    
seniority district after March 1, 1965?
  
OPINION
  
OF BOARD: The issue to be resolved in this dispute is identical
    
to that in Award No. 54 (Case No. SG-7-E), and the
 
_   Board is governed accordingly.
AWARD
Parts (a) and (b) of the Issue are not in dispute;
part (c) is answered in the negative.
 
"/ ?AM
 
Nicholas H. 7~mas
 
Neutral , oer
9
 
Dated: Washington, D. C.
  
April 23, 1969
1