. Award
J.
~. U
Case
.v3. vV-13-LL
SPECIAL
BOARD OF ADJUST.%ro-NT- NO. 605
i
' PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
TO ) and
! DISPUTE ) Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
QUESTION
1 AT ISSUE: (a) Did Carrier violate and does it continue to
violate the February 7, 1965 t?ediation Agreement
when Mr. S. R. Lowry, Assistant iiaintaincr, was
' not recalled to compensated service on the St. Louis
Division East End Seniority District by March 1,
i 1965?
I
1
i (b) Should. Mr. Lowry be recalled to service on his
home seniority district?
(c) Should Mr. Lowry now be allowed all travel time,
meal and lodging expenses and any wage loss, for each
working day commencing March 1, 1965, that he is
obliged to work on another seniority district? Should
such allowances be made so long as he works on another
seniority district after March 1, 1965?
OPINION
OF BOARD: The issue to be resolved in this dispute is identical
to that in Award No. 54 (Case No. SG-7-E), and the
_ Board is governed accordingly.
AWARD
Parts (a) and (b) of the Issue are not in dispute;
part (c) is answered in the negative.
"/ ?AM
Nicholas H. 7~mas
Neutral , oer
9
Dated: Washington, D. C.
April 23, 1969
1