Case No. SG-15-E
SPECIAL BOARD Or ADJUSTW'NT NO 605
PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
TO ) and
DISPUTE ) Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company
QUESTION
AT ISSUE: (a) Did Carrier violate and does it continue to
violate the February 7, 1965 Mediation A.,reernent
when Mr. Dale Leonard, Assistant Signal Maintainer,
was not recalled to compensated service on the
Pittsburgh East End Seniority District by March 1,
1965?
(b) Should Mr. Leonard now be recalled to service
on his home seniority district?
(c) Should Mr. Leonard nova be allowed pay for all
travel time and meal and lodging expense for each
working day commencing March 1, 1965, that he is
obliged to work on another seniority district?
Should such allowances be made so long as he continues
to work on another seniority district due to Manage
ment's failure to recall him to service on his own
seniority district by March 1, 1965?
OPINION
OF BOARD: The issue to be resolved in this dispute is identical
to that in Award No. 54 (Case No. SG-7-:^.), and the
Board is governed accordingly.
AWARD
Parts (a) and (b) of the Issue are not in dispute;
part (c) is answered in the negative.
Nholas H. Z mas
ic
Ae
Dated: Washington, D. C.
April 23, 1969