PARTIES ) Chicago and North Western Railway Company
 TO True' ) and
 DISPUTE ) Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees

 QUESTION
 AT ISSUE: Dons the attached. implementing agree
 ment proposed by the carrier fully
 comply with the provisions of Article
 III of the Agreement, and if not, in
 what respect should it be changed before
 transferring employees on the basis of
 these provisions?
 OPINION
 OF BOARD: It is impossible to determine from the sub
 missions whether any of the protected employees
 to be transferred are junior to unprotected employees in Sub
 division No. 2 of the Wisconsin Division, headquartered at
 Waul:egan, Illinois. If they are, the method of dovetailing
 specified in Award No. 79 (Case No. rT9-20-W) should be applied.
 In other respects the issues are the same.

              The Implementing Agreement proposed by Carrier should be changed before transferring employees, in accordance with Award No. 79 (Case No. MW-20-t9) .


                          MiF iedman, Referee


Dated: Washington, D, C.
 ,Tune g, 1969