PARTIES ) Chicago and North Western Railway Company
TO TrL ) and
DISPUTE ) Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees

OU-PSTIO14
AT ISSUE: Does the attached implementing agree
ment proposed by the carrier fully
comply with the provisions of Article
III of the Agreement, and i£ not, in
what respect. should it be changed
before transxlev-ri.ng e;rployeos on the
basis of these provisions?
OPINION
OF BOARD: The circumstances in this case are analogous
to those in Award No. 79 (Case No. TL^7-2C-:V) .
A t9 A R D





Dated: Washington, D. C.
June 9, 1969