SPEC:LZ'L BOARD OF ADJULTNTNT NO. 605
PARTIES ) Chicano, P.iilcra.u%ee, St. Paul & Pacific. Railroad Comp:xay
TO THE ) and.
DISPUTE Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
QUESTIONS (1) Did the Carrier violate the Mediation
AT ISSUE: Agreement dated February 7, 1965, Article
2, Section 1, when it failed to return
machine operator Eugene vT. Murphy to his
position as a Iiachine operator on the
Rocky Mountain Division on March 1, 1905
and
(2) Should Machine Operator Eugene W.
Murphy
now be compensateQ at his applicable
rate of pay for each work day lost from
March 1., 1.965 to March 20, 1_965.
OPINION Claimant qualified as a protected employee
OF 130A:!:D: and was furloughed in a force reduction on Janu
ary £3, 1965. He was not returned to active service
before march 1, 1965. ??nee he was furloughed, he filed his
name and address to retain his seniority. Under Rule 9(c),
he could have exercised his seniority to obtain a position
within 30 days. The 30-day period expired on February 7, 1965,
the date of the Agreement.
Article II, Section 1, provides that "an
employee shall cease to be a protected employee in case of
his... failure to retain or obtain a position available to him
in tire exercise of his seniority rights." On February 7
Claimant was a protected employee and this section was applicable to him as of that date. Not having obtained a position
through the exercise of seniority on February 7, which fell
within the 30-day period when he could have done so, he thereby
lost his protected status.
Article II, Section 1, does not have retroactive
effect (Award No. 63), but it must be applied on February 7,
1965, since that is the date on which the Agreement became
operative. This Committee lacks authority to amend the Agreement by deferring the application of a provision beyond the
date upon which it became operative.
AWARD No. ,6-5
Cas^ 270. t~I:9-7.3-67
A PI A R D
The answer to Questions 1 and 2 is
"T1o
e "
~.~;~`7~~t
~~
Milton FriednZn
NeLVC.ral tember
Dated: 47ashingLon, D.C.
June 10,
1969