Jl'1SC1^ I, J;0·.2
D 0: ^,~J 3J.~`'SIJ~ r10. 601
PARTIES ) Chcs.ap:a:e & Ohio I;.~i.lo:ay Co:,p.ny (Cli~.,^.l:_,-'.n Di.::tri.ct)
TO ) and
DISPUTE ) Broti.eriiood of Railroad SiLnalmnn
QUESTION
AT ISSUE: Is SiSn.31 3.clper Theodore Ferry cnti.Cl.ed to ;ireservntio:i
of coap..nsati.on end other benefits unc72x
Li,l-,
iebi:u-"ry 7,
1965 Agreer:wnt?
OPINION '
OF BOARD: lice ,ucsiion to be determined in this dispute is ic~ntic<:1
to that in Award P,o, 111 (Case No. :,'G-7-SE), and
Lh--
Board
is governed accordingly.
;.
A;.'P.R,.
Absent an imnlene ntir:C A;;roc::ent ti:e seni.oa..::y ri~h,:~ o° a
senior unprotected employe are not
in;
a iced in relation Lo a j'.:r:ior
protected employe by virtue of the provisions of the Fccrur.ry 7 <".C-ree::.::nt.
/f/lucholas
(~'v.f`J ... /i l/i , . y.
Id. ~uyas
Neutral N^y,:r,tlex
Dated: Washington, D. C
June 24, 1969