FRANK L. NOAKES
SECRETARY-TREASURER
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
AFFILIATED WITH THE A.F.L.-C.1.0. AND C.L.C.
GRAND LODGE
12050
WOODWARD
AV
E., DETROIT. MICHIGAN
98203
OFFICE O·
PRESIDENT
FILE
SBA #605
January 13, 1970 General
Mr. J. J. Berta
704-06 Consumers Building
220 South State Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Dear Brother Berta:
Re: Awards of Special Board of
Adjustment No. 605
For the completion of your records, I am
enclosing signed copies of Awards Nos. 164 through 177.
A copy of Award No. 169, with appropriate transmittal
letter, will be sent to General Chairman A. Farro.
With best wishes, I am
Sincerely and fraternally yours,
.
president
Enclosures
~d
s.
.;
C.
01=
I
LIN* · Chairman
F,.,_,iay Labor Bu;lding
o
Suite 804
,·.:;~ First Street, N.W. · Washington, D. C. 20001
Code 202 RE 7-1541
cc: Mr. L. P. Schoene
Mr. F. T. Lynch
GEL/np
John J. fdcNamara - Treasurer
Fifth Floor, VFW Building
200 Marylon-' P.vo., N.E. · Washington, D, C. 20002
Code 202 547-7540
January 5, 1970
Mr. C. L. Dennis
Mr. fi. C. Crony
Mr. A. It. Lawry
Mr. C. J. Chamberlain
Mr. R. tJ. Smith
Dear Sirs and Brothers:
Subject: Dispute Committee No. 605
Awards 164 through 168
(Signalmen Cases)
I am enclosing herewith copies of Awards Nos. 164 through 168
signed by Referee Friedman on December 8, 1969. Both the carrier
representatives and the organization representatives reserved the
right to dissent on some of these Awards but I doubt that any dissent
will be written. If there are you will be supplied with copies of
the dissents.
Chairmav
\1
a
Five Cooperating Raiy Labor Organizations
2:r1WT'cD 170.
Casa No. SG-27-E
SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUST_%f,,,,NT NO. 605
P:.R`hIES ) New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Cc.:~nany
TO Try ) and
DISPUTE ) Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
ISSUE.': Claim that Crier
improperly
abolished
positions held by Assistant Signalman
William Penc, Assistant P.iaintai ner
Edward Niewegloi%lski and Signalman
James T. Walsh, and should now be
required to allow them all compensation
and other benefits due under the provi
sions of the February 7, 1965 Agreement.
OPINION Although a time-limit issue arising out o° 'his
OF BOARD: claim has been submitted to the Third Division
by the Employer, the Employer stipulate that they
do not seek double compensation. In any event, the
matter is before this Committee on its merits and not on tae time
limit question.
The three Claimants are protected employees. They
were furloughed without compensation at different times during
the first half o£ 1968. Carrier's defence was that a decline
in business and a weak financial position necessitated these
actions.
However, Article I, Section 3. which permits a ,reduction in the number of protected employees, provides a specific method for calculating the allowable percentage reduction.
These procedures were not followed by Carrier. Indeed. Carrier
submitted none of the calculations specifically required by
Article I, Section 3.
Under the February 7, 3965, Agreement, Carriers
are not permitted to lay off protected employees without ecm.easation simply because business has fallen off, unless the average
percentage decline "of both operating revenue and net revenue ton
miles in any 30-day period" has exceeded 5% "compared with the
average of the same period for the years 1963 and 1964."Then,
A;·yfm No. ~
Case No. SG-27-2
and only then, under this provision employees may ba laid off
commensurate with that percentacfa decline. Having= utterly
failed to comply with this method by which there may be
a
reduction in force of protected employees, Carrier h,d no
contractual authority to furlough the Claimants.
A S? A R D
Claim sustained.
Milton Friedman
Neutral Member
Washington, D. C.
December g' , 1969
_2- .