SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT NO. 605
PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks,
 TO ) Freight fandlorn, Expross and Station Employes
 DISPUTE ) and
 The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
 QUESTIONS
 AT ISSUE: (1) Is Cla:mane Maxidean Adkins, an employe continued
 in service following a coordination, entitled to
 a monthly displacement allowance calculated in
 accordance with the formula contained in Suction
 6(c) of the Washington Agreement of May, 1936 in
 those months following the date of coordination
 in which such displacement allowance exceeds the
 allowances due under the Stabilization Agreement
 of February 7, 1965 or under Appendix A, Section
 1(c) of the implementing Agreem nt effective
 January 1, 1968?
 (2) If the answer to Question (1) is in the affirmative,
 shall the Carrier now compensate Claimant Maxidean
 Adkins the amount so due her for any month following
 the date of coordination?
 OP INTCN
 OF BOARD: The dispute here concerns itself with the question of
 whether Claimant Maxidean Adkins is being properly
 compensated under the provisions of Memorandum Agreement
 effective January 1, 1968.

 Claimant contends she is entitled to compensation based on average monthly compensation in the twelve (12) month test period preceding the change here involved. Carrier contends that this employe is being properly guaranteed at the rate of the position occupied immediately prior to the change (plus subsequent wage increases) in accordance with the agreement provisions.

 Based on the record as a whole we find that Claimant is being properly compensated in accordance with the Memorandum Agreement effective January 1, 1968 and is not entitled to the average monthly compensation sought.


                  _ 2 _


                  ALvA RD


Answer to Questions (1) and (2) is in the negative.

 CARRIER IIFIBERS EMPLOYEE i~MBERS

            r

          r yi'

          r,

          A


Dated: Washington, D. C.
 January 19, 1970