PARTIES) Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
 TO ) Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes
 DISPUTE) and
 Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
 QUESTIONS -
 AT ISSUE: (1) Is E. E. Campbell entitled to a protected rate under the
 February 7, 1965 Agreement at the rate of the Yardmaster's
 - position he held on October 1, 1964?
 (2) If the answer to Question (1) is in the affirmative, shall
 the Carrier now be required to compensate Claimant Campbell
 for the difference between his protected rate of the Yard
 master's position he held on October 1, 1964, and that of
 the Swing Clerk position he returned to on September 22,
 1969?
 OPINION
 OF BOARD: The-Question at Issue has been before this Committee with slightly
 different facts and rejected in our Awards 36, 195 and 205. In
 addition to the reasons furnished in those cases, we note the addi
 tional fact that Claimant was working on a yardmaster's position
 on October 1, 1964, under the Yardmasters' Agreement, which is not an organiza
 tion signatory to the February 7th Agreement.

            Questions 1 and 2 are answered in the negative.


                        llmt`Yal-ZGLf,~f~ ray M. Rohman utral Member


Dated: Washington, D. C.
 August 4, 1971