SPECIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT N0. 605
PARTIES) Cincinnati Union Terminal Company
TO THE ) and
DISPUTE) TC-Division, Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees
QUESTIONS
AT ISSUE: 1. Does the substitution of data covering "total engines and cars
handled" added to "Freight Movements and Detour Movements
computed on the basis that three such train movements equal
one car count" for "gross operating revenues" and "net revenue
ton miles" respectively, as those terms are used in Article I,
Sections 3 and 4 of the Agreement of February 7, 1965, provide
an appropriate measure of volume of business of the Cincinnati
Union Terminal Company for this craft?
2. If the answer to Question No. 1 is affirmative, should the
Agreement proposed by the Carrier, attached hereto as Carrier's
Exhibit No. 10, be entered into by the Organization representative
in disposition of this matter?
3. If the answer to Question No. 1 is negative, what data should
be substituted to provide an appropriate measure of volume of
business or in what manner or to what extent should the Carrier's
proposed Agreement (Carrier's Exhibit No. 10) be amended or
revised?
OPINION
OF BOARD: The Committee considers it necessary in this case to obtain additional
information from the parties.
A W A R D
The matter is remanded to the parties to provide the
Committee no later than January 10, 1972, with an
actual five-day first trick study of the ratio of
telegrapher time spent in the base period and presently
in handling detour freight movements compared to engines
and cars included in the monthly car count.
Milton Friedman
Neutral Member
Dated: Washington, D. C.
November 17, 1971