PARTIES ) Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
 TO THE ) Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
 DISPUTE ) and
 Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company
 QUESTIONS 1. Did those certain changes which the Carrier made at
 AT ISSUE: North St. Louis, Missouri, effective December 1, 1965,
 constitute technological, operational and/or organiza
 tional changes under the provisions of Article III of
 the February 7, 1965 Agreement?
ary 7, 1965 Agreement, particularly Articles III and
 VIII thereof, when, in instituting those certain changes
 at North St. Louis, Missouri, it transferred certain
 clerical work, service, duties and operations across
 craft lines to employes of another craft represented by
 another labor organization?
 3. Shall the Carrier be required to return the clerical
 work at North St. Louis, Missouri, to employes within
 the scope of the Clerks' Agreement?
 4. Shall the Carrier be required to compensate each and
 every employe involved in, or affected by, the transfer
 of work across craft lines instituted at North St. Louis,
 Missouri, effective December 1, 1965, and each day there
 after, the wage losses they have suffered on and after
 December 1, 1965? The employes involved or affected by
 the technological, operational and organizational changes
 are shown on a separate statement attached hereto as
 Employes' Exhibit 1.
 OPINION
 OF BOARD: The same parties and issues in this case were involved in Award
 No. 392 rendered this date. Accordingly, this claim is disposed
 of on the same basis.

            The answer to the questions is in the negative.


                            o ~i,


Murray M. Roman
 Neutral Member
 Dated: Washington, D. C.
 May 21, 1975