BEFORE PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 6239
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
CSX TRANSPORTATION
Case No. 50
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Appeal of the dismissal issued to Claimant H. E. Salkey as a result of
investigation held on September 16, 2003, in regards to Claimant's conduct
unbecoming an employee, insubordination, and a violation of Carrier
Operating Rule 501.
FINDINGS:
The Claimant was employed by the Carrier as a track foreman at the time of
this claim.
On August 29, 2003, the Carrier issued a notice informing the Claimant to
appear for a formal investigation in connection with his failure to comply with the
verbal instructions given to him by Assistant Roadmaster D. W. Hampton on
August 20, 2003. In addition, the Carrier indicated in the notice that on August
25, 2003, the Claimant had been observed at the Ft. Lauderdale Engineering office
using loud, boisterous, and threatening language and becoming violent. The
Carrier charged the Claimant with conduct unbecoming a Carrier employee,
insubordination, and a violation of Carrier Operating Rule 501. The Carrier
informed the Claimant that he was being withheld from service pending the
outcome of the investigation.
Pig ea3q
The hearing took place on September 16, 2003. On October 2, 2003, the
Carrier notified the Claimant that he had been found guilty of all charges and was
being dismissed from the service of the Carrier.
The parties being unable to resolve their dispute, this matter comes before
this Board.
This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we
find that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the
Claimant was guilty of conduct unbecoming a Carrier employee, insubordination,
and a violation of Carrier Operating Rule 501. The Claimant admitted that he did
not comply with instructions; he admitted missing a meeting with supervision; and
he admitted calling a supervisor a liar and being loud, all of which constituted
violations of Carrier rules.
Rule 501 states:
All employees must behave in a civil and courteous manner
when dealing with customers, fellow employees, and the
public.
Employees must not be . . . insubordinate . . . quarrelsome . . .
Once this Board has determined that there is sufficient evidence in the
record to support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to the type of
discipline imposed. This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of
discipline unless we find its actions to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or
capricious.
The Claimant in this case was guilty of very serious wrongdoing and only
2
PCB 6a3q
ill LOCI -50
had worked for the Carrier for a short period of time. Given the serious offenses
of which the Claimant was admittedly guilty, this Board cannot find that the
Carrier acted unreasonably, arbitrarily, or capriciously when it terminated his
employment. Therefore the claim must be denied.
AWARD:
The claim is denied.
P *RR.ME RS
Neu ber
Dated-
^I
3