AWARD N0. 118
Case No. 137
PUBLIC
LAW BOARD N0. 1582
PARTIES) ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE)
BROT77ERIIOOD OF
hfAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: (1) That the Carrier violated the provisions
o the greement
sy
unjustly discharging Coast Lines-Los Angeles
Terminal Division Welder R. A. Terry from service November 6, 1978.
(2) That the Carrier now reinstate Mr. R. A. Terry to service with
seniority, vacation, all other benefit rights unimpaired and compensation for wage loss beginning November 6, 1978 continuing forward until his reinstatement.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this disnute the claimant was employed by the Carrier on October
15, 1974. bn October 2, 1978 the claimant was notified to attend a
formal investigation to be held on October 6, 1978, The claimant
was charged with falsifying Form 1665 Standard for the period from
June 26 through July 25 and from July 26 through August 25, 1978,
which is a violation of Rules 2, 14, 16 and 31(B).
Pursuant to the investigation, the claimant was discharged from the
service of the Carrier. The Organization appealed the claim and
presented this case before the Board.
In addition to the transcript, the Carrier submitted Exhibits A
through K to be considered by the referee.
The claimant admitted that he had falsified the receipts. Claimant
explained that he received the hotel receipts improperly but he believed that such would offset his driving costs. The claimant believed he was entitled to hotel expense, if'hehad actually stayed
there, and under the circumstances, he was not actually defrauding
the Carrier of monies.
There is no question but that the actions of the claimant herein
are extremely serious and ordinarily would constitute grounds for
discharge. However, it is the opinion of the arbitrator that the
claimant actually believed he wasentitled to be reimbursed in this
manner.
Award No. 118
Case No. 137
Page 2
Although the claimant was not entitled to such reimbursement, it is
the opinion of the referee that permanent disi,:Cssal in this case is
too severe, and for that reason finds that thu claimant should be
reinstated with seniority and all other rights 1n:impaired but without pay for time lost.
AWARD: Claim sustained as per above.
ORDER: The Carrier is directed to comply with this award within
tTirty days from the date of this award.
iyreston , . .too:
e,
(:airman
r.:
rg~anz~zatio~ or
r·
b
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 7th day of April, 1980