.11J;AR:? M.190
Case ito. 223
PUBLIC
LAW
VO.UM
LIB/. 1rJ2
PARTIES) :kTCRISON, TOPEKA & SA14TA FE MIL:iAY Cu.a'A:iY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROT:MMI00D OF
MINTEMUICE OF UAY MIPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Carrier's decision to remove Plains Division Trackman
A. L. Hernandez, seniority date 2-01-71, from service as result of
investigation .held May 5, 1982 was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now
reinstate Claimant
to his former position
with seniority, vacation,
all
rights
unimpaired
and pay for all wage
loss beginning May 5, 1982 continuing forward and/or otherwise made
whole because: (a) the evidence
recorded
at the investigation did
not sustain the charges, and (b) even if the Carrior 11ad suzt=fined
the charges the discipline assessed was excessive.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Boars No. 1582 finds that the parties
er~eiu are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railvay
Labor Act, as amended, and that.
this Board
has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was charged with being
intoxicated and
in possession of marijuana while on Company property at approximately
1:55 a.m.
on the morning of March 22, 1982 at Wellington, Kansas.
Pursuant to the investigation the claimant was found guilty and was
permanently discharged from the service of the Carrier.
The Board has examined all the testimony of record and finds there
is sufficient evidence for the Carrier to reasonably and logically
determine.that the claimant was guilty.
A. D. Barker was working that night and testifies that he observed
a vehicle which was stuck and smoke was coming ==cm the back tyres.
He called a special officer and advised him what was occurring.
Special Agent R. L. Folley was contacted and advised that a vehicle
was
hung up on
some rail and to make an
investigation. He
testified
that he went to that location where he saw the claimant in a 1975
Chevrolet with Texas tags. He called the special officer and also
requested assistance from the ~Tellin;ton police.
Agent Folley testified that he approached the car and identified
himself and.requested identification from the claimant. He testified
that the claimant did not have any identification but did identify
himself as Alert Herrnandez. Agent Folley asked the claimant what
he was doing on Company property, and the claimant stated that he
was trying to get to Wellington, Kansas where he was to report for
f f
5g;;1-
Award
NIo.
190
Page
work. The Special Agent testified that he asked the claimant if he
knew where he was, and the claimant stated: "Well, I am
in Bovina,
Texas, aren't I7"
Agent Folley testified that the claimant they. stepped out of the
vehicle, st=.b led and al=st fell, then walked to the back: of his
vehicle where he was unsure of
his
walk and his balance was poor.
Shortly thereafter Ron Enrin arrived at the scene and another
officer, Rob Kogle,, arrived approximately five minutes later. The
Special Agent testified that he saw a paper sack with beer cans in
it, two of which were empty, and two were full of Coors Light Beer.
He testified that Mr. Kogle found a small yellow plastic butter
dish on the floorboard of the driver's side whica was later identified as marijuana. The identification was done by a field test.
The claimant was arrested and charged with DUI (Driving under the
influence). The court case was dismissed. The evidence clearly
establishes that the state would have been unable to prove the
charges since no one observed the claimant driving the vehicle.
The Special Agent testified that there was no question in his mind
but that the claimant was intoxicated.
A11 of the other testimony has been.reviewed, including the testimony of the claimant, and the evidence was sufficient Zor the Carriar
to make a finding that the claimant was guilty. Under tae circumstances there is no justification for setting the discipline aside.
AWARD: -Claim denied.,
Preston Xoore, Chairman
Dated at Chicago, Illinois /
~Z~7Z
June 30, 1982 <
ganI2ation Mersoer
I
arrier Member