AWARD N0. 234
Case No. 268
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 1582
PARTIES) THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Carrier's decision to assess claimant fifteen (15)
demerits after investigation May 13, 1983 was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now expunge fifteen (15) demerits from
claimant's record, reimbursing him for all wage loss
and expenses
incurred as a result of attending the investigation May 13, 1933,
because a review of the investigation transcript reveals that substantial evidence was not introduced that indicates claimant is
guilty of violation of rules he was charged with in the Notice of
Investigation.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
er~ein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was charged with absenting himself
from duty an March 16, 1983 without proper authority in violation
of Rule 15, General Rules for the Guidance of Employees, Form
2626 Standard. An investigation was held on May 13, 1983, and
the claimant was found guilty of violating Rule 15 and was assessed
15 demerits.
On March 16, 1983 the claimant was assigned to the Extra Gang on
the Dumas, Texas Section. Claimant's assigned hours were from
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. On March 16 the claimant reported at 8:00
a.m. and. left work at 10:00 a.m.
'The claimant testified that at 10:00 a.m. his foreman had not reported for work and that he had been instructed not to use the
Company phone. The claimant also testified that he wanted to go
see his doctor and that he waited until 10:00 a.m. to talk to his
foreman, and when his foreman had not reported by that time, he
departed.
The evidence indicates that the claimant was under the impression
that he was not allowed to use a Company phone. He further testified that this was the first time since he
bad
been employed that
a foreman had not reported for duty, and he was unaware of his
responsibilities under those circumstances.
/ Sga. _ Award No. 234
Page 2
After carefully reviewing the facts, it apears to the Board that
there is no justification for discipline.- Therefore, the 15 demerits will be set aside, and the claimant paid for wage loss and
expenses incurred as a result of attending the investigation, in
accordance with the agreement between the parties.
AAARD: Grievance sustained. '
ORDER: The Carrier is directed to comply with this award within
=ty days from the date of this award.
rr. .
Freston .. Moore, C irman
a ri Member
Dated August 16, 1983 at Chicago, Illinois