AWARD N0. 260
Case No. 294
PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 1582
PARTIES) THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. That the Carrier's decision to remove Plains Division Trackmen
C. J. Pierson, F. G. Calzada, G. C. Rivera, F. E. Cain, G. D. Hoyqs,
S. Loredo, J. V. Moreno, I. G.
Sanchez and
G. B. Aguilar from service was unjust.
2. That the Carrier now reinstate Claimants Pierson, Calzada, Rivera,
Cain, Hoyos, Loredo, Moreno, Sanchez and Aguilar with seniority,
vacation, all benefit rights unimpaired and pay for all wage loss as
a result of
investigation held
January 25, 1984 continuing forward
and/or otherwise made whole,'because the Carrier did not introduce
substantial, creditable evidence that proved'that the Claimants vio
lated the rules enumerated in their decision, and even if claimants
violated the rules enumerated in the:_decisiony~. ermanent removal
from service is extreme and harsh discipline un er Me circumstances.
FINDINGS: This-Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
er-ein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimants were notified to attend a formal investigation concerning their alleged
involvement with
the consumption of
alcoholic beverages in Bunk Car AT-203191, on Company property at
Alpine, Texas on the evening of November 30, 1983 and an alleged fight
that took place in the bunk car at approximately 2:30 p.m. on December
1, 1983.
Pursuant to the investigation the claimants were found guilty and
discharged from the service of the Carrier. The Board has examined
the 46 pages of testimony and after reviewing all the. evidence, finds
that there is sufficient evidence for the Carrier to find that the
claimants were guilty. Discipline is justified for all the claimarts,
however, the evidence indicates that more serious discipline is justified for claimants C. J. Pierson, F. G. Calzada and G. C. Rivera. '
It is the finding of the Board that anything in excess of six
months
is too severe and therefore, at the end'of the six
months period
of
time, on their date of termination, the Carrier is directed to reinstate them with seniority and all other rights unimpaired.
Claimants, F. E. Cain, G. D. Hoyos, S. Loredo, J. V. Moreno, I. G.
Sanchez and G. B. Aguilar deserve some discipline, however, their
PLB - 1582
/,s$2-
Award No. 260
Page 2
acts are not as serious as the other three claimants, therefore,
the Carrier is directed to reinstate them with seniority and all
other rights unimpaired without pay for time lost.
AWARD: Claim sustained as per above.
ORDER: The Carrier is directed to comply with this award within.
tTi~rty days from the date of this award.
rest on oren Mocre, Chairman
OrgaanIza ion member
,
em er