AWARD N0. 264
Case No. 297
PUBLIC LAW
BOARD 140. 158'2
PARTIES) ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA
r'::
tcULIWAY
(.U1
"Y-We
TV )
DISPUTE) BRUT1iER1tOOD OF MAIWTFNANCE OF W<1Y Ek-If..JY.:_ ,..
STATEiJENT OF CLAIM:
Claim that former Group G
Wal,i.x ,i
. · G, hestaz.
seniority ate une 4, 1979, w1wae seniority and `iupiwyaent were
terminated on the Eastern Lines on August 17, 190:3, for rainstat.,ment with seniority, vacation, all benefit rights restored and
compensation for all wage loss and/or otherwise wade whole beginning August
la,
1983.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
era are Carrier and employee within the weaning o.: the aailwuy
Labor
Act,
as amended, and that this Board has jurin.tietion.
In this dispute, the claimant was advised August 2,
153
that
hire
personal record was charged with fifty demerits.
L;
letter dated
August 11, 1983, the claimant was assesses with cei: ue"rits for
violation of Rule 8 of Instructions, which had been issued February 12, 1978. The claimant was dismissed for havinl. a balance
of 60 demerits. The last tan demerits were assessed for the
claimant's failure to mail timasheat documents for the last half
of July, 1983, in violation of Rule 8 of Instructions dated February 12, 1978.
The Brown System of demerits ham been approved by many awards, Ana
the only issue befors this Board is whether the ten demerits were
,justified or whether the tan demerits were harsh, arbitrary or
unjust.
The evidence of record establishes that the claimant did violate
Rule 8 of Instructions issued February 12, 197b. u:."~r those
circumstances, the Board has no authority to sat cite discipline
aside.
KWARD:
Claim denied.
"estun
restun
.lou~, .:~:.:Le..:an
,~ i
Union
Member`