Ai46RD 130. 292
,;use CJo. :;2/
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 1532
PARTIES) TIM, ATCHIS0N, TOPEKA AND SANTA l:'1: RAILWAY CM1!':~1
'PO )
D1:;PUTE) BRUTHFIWOOD OF fiAINTENANCE OF WAY I:Mfl.Oil::~
STATU-ll:NT OJ·' CLAIM: '1
`hat tile Carrier's
J'CiS1Uli
tU :;uL:iir.:lJ
Ff~1~JI4:~i.'viu oii`i`Tit·hlne Operator J. W. IIcc-Icer from Lairvico f.il
45 d-yu was unjust; That the Carrier now lilt the j.ust>ciloiurl
from Claimant Heckc·r'a record as a result: u-1J
Novl·!iibor 1.9, 19$4, because the Carrier did clot iiarol1ut_.: ::ub!,t..ari
tial, creditable uvicicnce that proved that the
Cla,lcant -!iolatedl
tire rules eawiieratad in their decision, an. even if Claiii,allt
violated the rules enumerated in the decision, a su:~iic:n:;i.~u GE
45 days is extrewc
aivl
harsh discipline under the circumstances.
FIjJ;~INGS: This Public Law Board No. 158: Hnds tlrc.t
ti,L
_)art:e-:
sere
n
re Carrier aad employee within the weanii<<; of iii:: itaiio.;ly
Labor Act, as ainerded, aril that this Board has ,ji.irisS~.a.i~nl.
In ties dispute the claiamint was notified to attend an invti6t.i.t;:; t' l:ai
.lit
Newton, iKanaari, on HVVember 19, 1934 ;:v
U(,`t(`!".,..~.·.i~ i· ~ ·.
rct~iru!iaibilicy, if any, in connection with possible vi.o?at:.ull
of K;iles 1?.'_-D, 77U, 1055, arid 1056, Rules Maintenance u:: Way ,.r.,i
Striic=ores, 'coricernin.- Ills alleged failure to lock sw:'tcal at the
west
Laid
of. elevator truck CLIC 8601 at Alamoto and failure to
movia mschincr AT-3796 to east end of elevator track fsti01, as
instructed by Foreman Alvarez. Pursuant to the invc.::tit,.ztion,
the .`laiiaant was found guilty and assessed a 45-day suspunsion.
The claimant and another employee had been instructed by tile foroman to place the stiff doom Tie Handler or: the east end of Track
360: .for tile night. They placed it on the west end of the tr:il-k.
Early
1.110 fellUWiil;; AlOrW.ll$,
a
lO::til
entered file
ic`CSt C_?4 Of
t.:'C
eleWir,il7 t-ra ck, struck The derail and tlic '!'ie
lia~.:al ~_
a l'..
deicol i.sacd tae Handler.
The
foreman testified ti:at hr. 1·-iu
instructed
the two employees to place the
machicv -)aca; ~·:: cast:
end of Track 8601.
ilic
other criinloyee accepted 30 days suspension. The .:l..i;%:~tnt .t:.,i
not find
aile-;ed
that lie did iiot hear the instruot?.ors. :::r e':xJencQ in dicatos that he was in
the samin
1ocatioil as lips
I::llo-d
Emrhoyot<~ waved to the foreman when 111E in6tiuctioiis worn
t:~iyC'ri,
t
and. tium that eve.l.l.ng failed to advise the: kore::::.mi tact !-,c ha.!
pL_1Lced
t.tie
machine in C:ae west end instcaJ of the ea^t
c,13.
Uruier t!la` c:i.r: umat::..·_c:E, there is s~.rfici,:rtv w:.'eac~ fc°. t'- ,e
· PLB No. 1582
Award
L;o.
292
f::;~n_ 2
Carrier to find the claimant guilty, but it is the opinion of
the
Board that 45 days is too severe. Under the circc;astance n, 3',) dayj
suspension is the most that can'be ;justified. The disc.inl.ine i::
reduced to thirty days.
AWAIU): Claim sustained as per above.
ORDER; The Carrier is directed to comply with this award within
=:y days from ttie date of this award.
i~
42:4torni ..oorc,
Chairman
c. _
Union 1--lember
_..~
Carrier · Mem - "-'-'-__.__
Dated at r:hica8o, Illinois
January 14, 1985