AWARD N0. 352
CASE No. 387
PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 1582
PARTIES) ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
TO )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: That the Carrier's decision to assess
Claimant R. J. Hopper twenty (20) demerits after investigation May 20, 1986 was unjust; That the Carrier now
expunge twenty (20) demerits from Claimant's record, reimbursing him for all wage loss and expenses incurred as a
result of attending the investigation May 20, 1986, because
a review of the investigation transcript reveals that substantial evidence was not introduced that indicates Claimant
is guilty of violation of rules he was charged with in the
Notice of Investigation.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the
parties herein are Carrier and employee within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board
has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was notified to attend a formal
investigation in Amarillo, Texas, on May 30, 1986, concerning his allegedly delaying Train 1-891-30 on May 1, 1986 and
Train 1-891-01 on May 2, 1986. Pursuant to the investigation
the claimant was found guilty and assessed twenty demerits.
The Organization filed an appeal on the claimant's behalf
and the matter is now before the Board for adjudication.
The claimant was charged with violating Rule 1060, which
states ". . . They must, if practicable, make repairs to
track, at such time and in such manner as will avoid delay
to trains . . . ." Dispatcher John Marshall testified that
Extra Gang 50 was working in his territory on May ist and 2nd,
1986, and that on May 1st 891 Train was delayed by Extra Gang
50 for about fifty-five minutes. He also testified that on
May 2nd, Train 891 was delayed by Extra Gang 50 for approximately fifteen minutes. lie also testified that 891 was considered an important train. He further testified that it is
the responsibility of a foreman to clear his gang in advance
of a train that should not be delayed.
The Board has
studied the
testimony of the witnesses. The
evidence indicates that the claimant was the foreman of Extra
Gang 50 on May 1st and 2nd, 1986. On those dates the claimant's gang was working under Form B protection most of the
time. The claimant conceded he had not checked with the
PLB-1582
/S8~1-
Award No. 352
r
Page 2
Dispatcher on and off during May 1 regarding the location of
Train 891. He also stated that he had not made any attempt
to get in the clear prior to 891 actually calling him. He
admitted that Train 891 was delayed, but contends it was
because the pup tamper derailed at approximately 11:05 a.m.
lie also testified that on flay 2nd he had not contacted the
Dispatcher prior to the arrival of 891 train. He testified
that on May 1st he was advised which trains were top priority.
He testified he had been working on the double track for
approximately one month. He also stated he advised the Roadmaster that he had not worked in 251 territory very much and
wasn't very good at it.
The Organization also objected to the fact that several witnesses
requested by the claimant were not present. Some of those requested were present and others declined to attend. In the
instant case, the evidence indicates that those requested were
not necessary witnesses. If they were deemed to be necessary
witnesses, it is incumbent upon the Carrier to call them and
see that they are present for the investigation. If they are
not necessary witnesses, the Organization may call them as witnesses and be responsible for their expenses and loss of earnings.
The claimant herein was inexperienced in 251 territory, and
the delay on May 1st may have been justified by the derail
of the pup tamper. However, the claimant should have had his
act together on May 2, and the delay should not have occurred.
Under these circumstances, it is the opinion of the Board that
twenty demerits is excessive. The demerits assessed the claimant will be reduced to ten demerits.
AWARD: Claim sustained as per above.
ORDER: The Carrier is directed to comply with this award
within thirty days from the date of this award.
Preston J../Moore, Chai
a
v
i~
Union Member
Dated at Chicago, Illinois
-2 -.z
6;12:~
August 11, 1986
Carrier Memb r