PUBLIC LAW BOARD h0. 1582
PARTIES) ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE
RAILWAY CO:-'PAWY
TO ) ~,
SPVTZ) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF 17AY E24PLfiZEES
STATE2.1ENT OF CLAIM: Claim is in behalf of
A.
J. Rael for reinsewtement to his tormer posit16n of Machine Operator on the New
c;e:=ico Division i-aith seniority, vacation and all cther rights
;unimpaired and compensation for wage loss commencing May 20, 1975
continuing tonaard to date that he is restored to service.
7:"DINGS: This Public La·.a Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
.. __;
nc°c~re Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
7;_=or ycw,
,s
cmend3'dll, and ,=173t this Board
f~as ,A7.1r=.fiC=.Ct~_G:d.
.~_Z~J
.JLJ~J~
.~__s7.
_L_vr=nt
f
.-as imnrs~a.'.d
'r= . ~~ f
7eri ~cv o
L
Cz=-rier for being,i_nszbordinate. The Orl-ani43ticn ccnte,ds that
.__=3 "7aiIIi3:1.`_ .,"5 ".^::
_7.ouDprdi=':ate is irat he
SIaS
-e"·,"?'°' zm^utructad
i:0
perlorm a service which he refused to perzorwl.=::'d claimant
__~, ^;so
-'.oind
S1_ilt:7 of vi_olatinRule 1055.
'f3
cia-iannt'-'
oC7n
tootimony finds him Suilty of irsubordination.
".;^ '2ar
f.' " O~
i_ne.- Transcript). Also, ,.glee Page l O::
the
Transcr'i'Jr
.,:^~re the roa4^aster testified
that
the C.;aiMant
_~·:_:DC~'
to do tI?2
57'OzY
`which he had c:ecn instr't'Cted to do.
'-:=c0.
Or,an1-nation
also
contends that the Carrier
V:O=-_S
e:.^.'-1 Article
-'action 1 Of the current Ati°recment when th3
Ci~?u::'ti:
i::s rcm`0vcd
_r^m service. This is a typo of violation
Which ,;Justices a sas·-
:nsica under Secticn 2 of Article 5 of t::; Ag=cemer'v. Under thow>2
_ __c,~,stances;?er~ is
VO
violation o_= Section 1 0A:rticle 5. ?n
7_.z,:7
of
the evidence and testimony o__' recozU, ttcra ::.s co
b.-nis
to
O'.;C'rrti
the eeeisicn of the Carrier.
-A
RD: Claim ce:licd.
9
y "'?/ 77
1 4J1..GZ
.$.~i7113.,
v_.1.~
wn
~wr
OL~u111_:3 L'1_1
: f
'.~.TUJ
WL
O
~ar-tie3~i:2~oer