PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 1582
PARTIES) THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
T0~ )
DISPUTE) BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. Carrier's decision to remove former Kansas (Colorado) Division
Trackman L. A. Gallegos from service, effective December 16, 1988,
was unjust. -_;~·
Accordingly, Carrier should be required to reinstate Claimant
Gallegos to service with his seniority rights unimpaired and compensate him for all wages lost from December 16, 1988.
FINDINGS: This Public Law Board No. 1582 finds that the parties
herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board has jurisdiction.
In this dispute the claimant was notified to attend an investigation
in La Junta, Colorado on December 12, 1988. The claimant was
charged with being absent without proper authority on November 10
and November 11, 1988. Pursuant to the investigation, which had
been postponed until December 16, 1988, the claimant was dismissed
from the service of the Carrier.
Foreman A. P. Campos testified that he was a Relief Track Supervisor
and the claimant was assigned to his gang on November 10 and 11, 1988.
He stated the claimant did not work on either November 10 or 11, and
he did not have permission to be absent on either date.
Foreman Campos testified that the claimant did not ask to be off on
November 10 but did call in on November 11 at approximately 6:45
a.m. and asked to be off, but permission was refused. Mr. Campos
further stated he did not give the claimant the day off on November
9 since he needed everybody and had worked alongside his men. He
also stated he had had previous problems with the claimant.
The claimant testified he did not get permission from Foreman'
Campos to be off on November 10 because he was not at the hotel
where he called.
The claimant testified he talked to the Roadmaster's clerk and then
talked to Roadmaster Trimble and told him he was
in
the process of
moving. The claimant stated that the following day at about 6:45
a.m. he called his foreman, and the foreman advised him he marked
him AWOL. He stated he then asked the foreman if he could-take off
/5$2
- Award No. 476:
· Page 2
Friday, and the foreman told him he could not since he was short of
men. He testified that when he was refused the day off, he said he
would be there in about two hours, and the Foreman saidNo, ,
No, just talk to Charrow."
The claimant testified he contacted Mr. Charrow who asked him if he
had a -personal day left, and when he responded that he did not and
it was used up, Mr. Charrow told him to call Roadmaster Trimble.
The claimant stated he did contact Roadmaster Trimble and advised
him he would be absent that day, and Roadmaster Trimble told him to
contact Foreman Campos.
Local Chairman Luginbill requested that Mr. Trimble, Mr. Gallegos
and Mr. Campos be excused. The Chairman denied the request and
allowed Mr. Campos to remain although Mr. Luginbill protested and
stated he was going to recall Mr. Campos for'further testimony.
The Board notes that such a response is in error. This, in effect,
calls for the sequestering of witnesses. Although the Local Chairman and Vice Chairman did not use the proper term, it should have
been clear to the Chairman that "the rule" had been called for,
and such should have been granted. Foreman Campos was recalled and
questioned by Mr. Luginbill.
The claimant herein was assessed 30 demerits which resulted in his
accumulating 60 demerits which subjected him to discharge. The
Board finds that under the circumstances herein the discipline
assessed is harsh, arbitrary and unjust. The Carrier is directed
to reinstate the claimant with seniority and all other rights unimpaired but without pay for time lost. Further, the claimant's
demerits will be reduced to 45 demerits.
AWARD: Claim sustained as per above. _ .
ORDER: The Carrier is directed to comply with this award within
thirty days from the date of this award.
' Preston Moore, Chairman
Union Member
J7 ~51
Carrier Member