Award No. 9
Case No. 19
File No. 7785-854
Parties United Transportation Union (T)
to and
Di.spxtn Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad
any
Statement "Request of Local CaTnittee, UTU, that record of Marvin DeWitt Hooker '
of Claim: be cleared of 10 days record suspension for the following alleged offense:
'Responsibility in connection with accident chic occurred at approximately
10:40 p.m. March 24, 1975, when placing loaded quignresxt on Cargill Grain
Elevator Inbound Track, resulting in damage to equipment, tracks and
personal injury sustained by three (3) employees of Cargill Grain Ele
vator.
"'
Findings: The Hoard finds, after hearing upon the whole record and all evidence,
that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning of
the Railway Labor Act, as amended, that this Hoard is duly o:)nstituted
by Agreement dated October 24, 7975, that it has jurisdiction of the
parties and the subject matter, and that the parties were given due
notice of the hearings held.
Claimant, on March 24, 1975, was assigned as Conductor on Crew 124 with
hours 3:45 p.m. to 11:45 pm. About 10:40 p.m., Crew 124 while shoving
23 cars loaded with grain, blind, into Cargill Grain Elevator unloading
facility, collided with nine loaded cars which were then being duTped
by
Cargill employees. Three of such employees were injured, tav cars dinged
and the rail at the paint of impact rolled over. As a result of an investigation
=ducted
on March 27, 1975, Claimant wds asessed ten (10) days
record suspension.
she record reflects that collision occurred because a crew member was
not assigxed to the leading car as required by Operating F3ale 103, because
the crew operated by "prar~-ice." A71 tare crew
n
were not placed
in positions mosm advantageous to the protection of the movements involved
in the collision. The circumstances were obviously not the same and the
contradiction between an assertion and a fact has clearly emphasized by
the rollision owing on a track stated
by
Claimant to be"apparently"
clear.
PhUe Claimant might otherwise be guilty on such a recrord,it cannot be
.. DLO IL3~
-2- Award No. 9
used here. The discipline imposed was vitiated by the Hearing Officer's
refusal
to
listen or permit witness F. A. Hooker, Sr., to testify. The
judgmnt of whether such testiirony is relevant to the purpose for which
the investigation is held is better determined after it has been at least
partially if not fully heard. Here, however, the
denial to
not permit
such witness of 31 years service aryl who worked a Cargill assignment for
many years
to
testify is construed to be a denial of Claimant's basic
right to have witnesses on his behalf. It was an arbitrary decision
. which causes the Hoard to sustain the claim herein.
Award: Claim sustained.
Order: Carrier is directed to make this Award effective within rh:*-ri. (30)
days of date of issuance shown below.
Eyed A. Hardin, aiployee Meuber F. . M4 Carrier Marber
Arthur T. Clan Wart, Chairman end Neutral Member
Issued at Atlanta, Georgia, Novetber B , 1977.