PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 1760
Final Award No. 107
Docket No. 107
N&W File MW-DEC-89-1
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute Norfolk and Western Railway Company
(Former Wabash)
Statement
of Claim: Claim on behalf of R. L. Odle requesting that he be
reinstated and paid for all time lost as a result of his
dismissal assessed following a January 5, 1989 investigation
in whfich he was charged with violation of Norfolk Southern
Safety and General Conduct Rule GR-12.
Findings: The Board has jurisdiction of this case by reason of the
parties Agreement establishing this Board therefor.
Claimant Machine Operator was assigned with four other
employees as brush cutter operators. Claimant, on January
9, 1989, brought a .357 Magnum hand gun onto the property.
He showed it to the employees with whom he worked. Before
leaving for the job site the gun was wrapped in a sleeping
bag and placed in the trunk of Mr. Stanley's vehicle.
Following work that day several of the employees,
including Messrs. Stanley and Odle, went to a nearby bar and
consumed several beers. Mr. Barr returned to the trailer
first and went to sleep. Some time later, after having
continued their drinking at another bar, Messrs. Thompson
and Odle returned to the trailer. Although the precise
details are unknown, within a few minutes of their return
employee S. N. Thompson used Claimant's hand gun to inflict
a fatal gunshot wound to his head.
Claimant was removed from service, and cited to a
formal investigation on the charge of violating Norfolk and
Southern Safety and General Conduct Rule GR-12 reading:
"Employees are prohibited from having loaded or unloaded
firearms in their possession while on duty or on cofipany
property except security and forestry officers authorized to
do so in the performance of their duties or those given
special permission in writing by the Head of Police and
Special Services."
Claimant was accorded the due process to which entitled
under Rule 30. His removal from service pending
investigation was proper. There was a clear violation of
Rule GR-12.
There was sufficient evidence adduced, including
Claimant's admissions, to support Carrier's conclusions of
Claimant's culpability of violation of Rule GR-12. But for
Claimant Odle having violated the safety intended Rule GR-12
Mr. Thompson would not have been able to kill himself. That
fatal fact demonstrates the very reason why the Carrier is
so adamant in its prohibition of firearms on the property.
Firearms, by their nature, are extremely dangerous. They
have no business being on the property.
Notwithstanding, the Board finds that Claimant's good
record and years of service are such that the length of time
out of service may well have caused the magnitude of
Claimant's violation to sink in and thus will help to make
him a better employee. Claimant will be returned to service
with all rights unimpaired but without pay for time out of
service subject of course to taking a physical examination.
Award: Claim disposed of as per findings.
Order: Carrier is directed to make this Award effective within
thirty (30) days of date of issuance shown below.
. 'Hammonds, Emp
o,ee
Member L. .Miller, Jr. rier Member
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
Issued February 23, 1990.