PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 1760
Award No. 150
Case No. 150
File MW-DECR-93-02
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
to and
Dispute Norfolk & Western Railway Company
Statement
of Claim: Claim on behalf of R. Battle requesting that he be
reinstated to service and paid for time lost, as a result
of
his dismissal from all service following formal
investigation held on April 16, 1993, in connection with his
being observed in violation of Rule G.
Findings: This Board has jurisdiction of this case by reason of
the parties Agreement establishing the Board therefor.
The Claimant, R. Battle, on February 8, 1993,was
regularly assigned as an anchor adjusting machine operator
on a rail transposing gang. Other gang members were unable
to awaken Claimant on the morning of February 8th in order
to begin the day's work. That fact was reported to the
Track Supervisor. The Track Supervisor and the Assistant
Track Supervisor went to the Claimant's camp trailer about
1:30 in the afternoon. They found him sitting on the edge
of the bed. The Claimant advised that he was sick. When
asked why, he told them he had been drinking the night
before and that he was not in any shape to go to work. The
two supervisors asserted that they could smell alcohol from
the Claimant.
The Claimant was notified to attend an investigation on
' the charge:
i
"For the incident on February 8, 1993 at approximately 1:30
PM in the camp car located at Federal Yard, you were
observed to be in violation of Operating Rule G of the
Norfolk Southern Operating Rules."
As a result of the investigation, Carrier concluded
culpability of the charge. The Claimant was dismissed from
service as discipline therefor.
Rule G reads:
"An employee who reports for duty under the influence of
alcohol or other intoxicant, cannabis in any form,
amphetamine, a narcotic drug, a hallucinogenic drug, any
controlled substance, as defined by Federal law, or a
derivative or combination of any of these or who uses any of
the foregoing while on duty, will be dismissed. Possession
of any of the foregoing while on duty, or possession, use,
or being under the influence of any of the foregoing while
on company property, or occupying facilities provided by the
company, is prohibited."
The Board finds that there are circumstances that serve
to mitigate the discipline accorded Claimant. The Board
will conditionally reinstate Claimant to service with all
rights preserved but without pay for the time out of service
subject to his entering and successfully passing the OARS
program and thereafter being placed in a probationary status
for one year's basis. During this period he will have the
right to be protected under his discipline rule. If the
Claimant does not accept this understanding within 30 days
of being notified therefor and act thereon, the claim will
be then denied and the Claimant will remain dismissed.
Award: Claim disposed of as per findings.
Order: Carrier is directed to make this Award effective within
thirty (30) days of date of issuance shown below.
S. A. H mmo s, Jr.; Em loy Member E. N. Jacob Jr., Car i Member
l
i
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
Issued
July 30, 1994.