PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 1760
Award No. 46
Case No. 46
Docket No. MW-DEC-7920
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
to and
Dispute Norfolk and Western Railway
company (Former Wabash)
Statement
of Claim: 1. Carrier violated the effective agreement when
Donald R. White was unjustly dismissed on November 25, 1981.
2. Claimant White shall now be returned to service
with all rights unimpaired, that he be paid for all
time held out of service.
Findings: The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and all evidence,
finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, that this Board is duly constituted
by Agreement dated February 2, 1976, that it has jurisdiction of the parties
and the subject matter, and that the parties were given due notice of the
hearing held.
Claimant, a Roadway Equipment Repairman for 8 years, was notified,
under date of November 25, 1981, by the Division Engineer Maintenance
as follows:
"You are hereby dismissed from all service
with the Norfolk and Western Railway Company
at 4:14 PM, November 25, 1981 in connection
with violation of Safety Rule 1001 of the Norfolk
and Western Safety Rule Book effective March 1,
1981 in connection with the accident of vehicle
5568 near Pittsfield, Illinois at approximately
8:00 PM November 23, 1981. Also, insubordination
in connection with your duties and responsibilities
on November 24, 1981."
As requested a formal investigation which was ultimately granted and
held January 7, 1982 on the charge:
"Rule G, Rule 1001, Rule 1001C, Rule 1003.
You are also charged with the unauthorized
PLO
i-7(oe
-2- Award No. 46
use of the vehicle 5568 at the time of the
accident and being charged with the following
rules of the Norfolk and Western Railway
Company Form MM158, Rules and Instructions
Governing The Use Of Operation and Maintenance of
the Norfolk and Western Owned Highway
Motor Vehicles, Rule 4-Page 1, Rule 8 - Page 19.
You are also being charged for insubordination
in connection with your responsibilities and
duties on November 24, 1981."
As a result of the investigation held, Claimant was notified under
date of January 18, 1982 that the dismissal was upheld.
Claimant was accorded the due process to which entitled under his
discipline rule.
There was sufficient, competent, credible evidence adduced to support
the conclusions reached by Carrier as to its conclusions of Claimant's
guilt on the charges placed against him. The accident report from the
Illinois State Police signed by an Officer Clendenny and Tower Operator
Douglas Cox who picked Claimant up and drove him to the Police Station,
was at the investigation. Further, supportive testimony was given by Division
Engineer Cashner, who had interviewed Pike County Deputy Sheriff Gwartney
who had stated that in his opinion Claimant appeared to be intoxicated,
when he was trying to persuade said Sheriff to arrest somebody who had
tried to sell him some dope but was unable to designate the alleged
perpitrator.
Claimant was also properly found guilty of violating standing instructions
to communicate with his supervisor twice a day when away from home.
He also failed to timely advise as to the N&W vehicle being overturned.
This Board is impelled to find that the discipline assessed, in
light of Claimant's service record, particularly that he had been
reinstated by our Award No. 28 also involved Rule G and driving a
Company truck, was reasonable. This claim will be denied.
Award: Claim denied.
p ._ ,V
PLB 11ba
-3- Award No. 46
,~/~
P
~1. A. Christie Employee Member S. C. Lyons, Car ' r Member
. -, ~ Z.
1'/
Arthur T. Van Wart, ~- airman
'and Neutral Member
Issued Decem ber 14, 1984.