CASE #18
-w a-YL
a
(MW-MUN-77-29)
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
vs
Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1. The Carrier violated the effective agreement dated
February 1, 1951 when, on March 29, 1977, the claimant D. E.
McCullough was dismissed from service with the Carrier.
2. The dismissal of the claimant was capricious, unjust,
unwarranted, and the investigation was not held in compliance
with the agreement. The claimant should now be restored to
service with seniority unimpaired, and payment allowed for
the assigned working hours actually lost, less any earnings
in the service of the company.
FINDINGS: This Board upon the whole record and all the
evidence finds that:
The carrier and employee involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act, as amended.
This Board had jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
OPINION:
The threshold question for this Board to address is
whether or not the merits of the case are properly before
it. The record indicates that, at the Claimant's initiative.
the Third Division of the Adjustment Board twice entertained
the merits issue as an "MS" case. The first time the dispute
was withdrawn from that august body and returned to the property at the behest of the Claimant. The second time it was
docketed (as MS-22410) again at the Claimant's request and
disposed of by Award No. 22330. TheOrganization
Case #IS
Page 2
now proposes consideration by this Board of the same
circumstances addressed by the Third Division. We shall
respectfully refuse to do so; the Claimant has received
due consideration of his grievance before a proper forum;
we shall not now afford him a second opportunity.
AWARD:
The merits of this case are not properly before this
Board; Claim is dismissed.
,%,~ I(VI4,~-
-
Neu"' Member
-S AID I
G. C. Edwards. Fred Wurpe , Jr.
Carrier Member Organization Mem r
Dated this V-J~4day of
124
AS-0
at
4:N
.. A-Lup -l~. l 3