PUBLIC LAW BOARD 1837

(MW-BVE-77-76-78)
Case No.11

PARTIES TO DISPUTE;



STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





FINDINGS:



The carrier and the employee involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended.

This Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

OPINION:



assigned to the T-6 Gang. For the several months he was em-

ployed prior to his removal, the Claimant accrued excessive

absences doing so without prior approval or acceptable excuse.

Then, in September 28, 1977, he walked off the job without



approval or Stificatlon to his.superAor of his intent to do so. For both separate offenses, excessive absenteeism and absence without approval, he was given a hearing at which time he essentially admitted such infraction, citing unspecified "personal reasons" as the basis therefor.
Tbe.Organization contends the claimant was not given a fair opportunity to correct his attendance record and to become fulLy,aware of the Carrier's expectations of him; it also asserts an. unfair hearing procedure by having the Claimant's supervior as hearing officer.

          We find no basis for any asserted procedural errors

on the conduct of the hearing- Additionally, we are un-.
convinced that the Claimant was not aware of the potential.
of removal if his poor attendance persisted. Being a short`
service. employee-, he should-have been concerned to demonstrate.
himself as a.responsbile employee. He. did not.
AWARD:
Claim is denied.

            Jam F. Scea,,rce, Neutral Member


G. C. Edwards, Carrier Member w. E. LaRue, Organization Member

Dated at ~~9..s this 1-- day of (.1.
                                                    1980


r. , _2 _