PUBLIC LAW BOARD
N0. 2142
Award No. 4
' Docket
No. MW-1117
Case No.
12
Parties Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Eaiployees
to and
Dispute Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
Statement
of Claim: That the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad unjustly dismissed
M. J. DeLeon from the service, effective February 23, 1977.
That the Illinois Central Gulf Railroad be ordered to restore
M. J. DeLeon to service with all rights unimpaired and to
pay M. J. DeLeon for each day commencing February
24,
1977
and continuing until he is returned to service.
Findings.: The Board, after hearing upon the whole record and evidence,
finds chat the parties herein are Carrier and Dnployee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, that this Board is duly
constituted by Agreement dated January
23, 1978,
that it has jurisdiction
of the parties and the subject matter, and =hat the parties were given
due notice of the hearing held.
Claimant Trackman, about 11:30 a.m. on February 3, 1977, entered a
tool shanty where several section gang members were eating lunch. He
commenced to accuse Trackman R. Randolph of having stolen his bag of
marijuana. Trackman Randolph denied such accusations. Whereupon
frackman M. J. De Leon engaged in an altercation with Mr. Randolph. The
fight, witnessed by seven people, continued until broken up by Track
Foreman Carson.
' -2- Public Law
Board. No. 2142
Award No. 4
Carrier's Special Agents and the Park Forest South Police came to
the scene. They
interviewed and searched both Claimant DeLeon and Trackman Randolph. No marijuana was found on either person or in the area.
Mr. Randolph refused to press the charge of assault against Claimant.
Claimant was removed from service
pending a
formal investigation.
Claimant was
notified to
attend an investigation on February 16, 1977
to determine whether he was
involved in
an altercation on February 3, 1977
with a fellow employee. As a result thereof, Carrier concluded that
Claimant was guilty of the charge brought against him and that he had
thereby violated Rule K of the Rules for the Maintenance of Way and
Structures.. Claimant was dismissed as discipline therefor. Rule K,
in pertinent part, provides:
"Conduct-Courteous deportment is
required of
all employees
in their relations with...each other... Employees must not
eater into altercation.-.fight ...while on duty or on Company
property. `
anployees must not be: ....(5) Quarrelsome or otherwise
vicious ...."
?'he Board
finds that
Claimant was given a fair hearing, ably
represented, had witnesses, faced his accuser, and exercised his right of
appeal. It was not prejudgment for Carrier to not have cited Trackman
Randolph. The facts collected prior to the hearing so clearly indicated
that Claimant was the aggressor, that he initiated the fight, that
Mr. Randolph was a victim of circumstance who had acted in self defense
and therefore incidently suffered physically for such imbalance, that
these was -. need to cite Mr. Randolph as a defendant. He was present
as a wit-ess.
- -3- Public Law Hoard No. 2142
Award No. 4
There was sufficient competent and probative evidence adduced,
a
including Claimant's admission that he was fully aware of the rules and
-
that he did not comply with Rule K,
to support
Carrier's conclusion as
·
to Claimant's culpability. The evidence was simply overwhelming as to
Claimant's onerous conduct. There was no provocation therefor shown or
proved to justify Claimant's unwarranted and vicious attack against a
fellow employee while on duty and on Company property. Rule R was clearly
violated.
The Hoard finds that the seriousness of the offense, Claimant's
conduct and his brief period of service were'such'as to conclude that
:he discipline assessed. was.-not unreasonable: This claim will be
denied.
Award: Claim denied.
. J Cunningham, ,Imployee*_ Veer' g ,
Carrier Member
Arthur T. Van Wart, Chairman
and Neutral Member
lssued at Fal.mo:_th, Massachusetts, August ?$, 1978,