rights unimpaired and payment for all time lost.
FINDINGS: The present case and our Award 14 concern the same
basic situation, contentions, rules and evidence and
we find no persuasive reason for reaching a different
conclusion here than we did in Award No. 14. Testimony
received in a different hearing that claimant did not
" .attend is not admissible in this case since no oppor
tunity was afforded for cross-examination
AWARD: Claimant to be reinstated immediately but without



t
Adopted at Philadelphia, Pa., 7)C&I 17 1 1979.

M. Weston,`ehairman

rr

Employe Member