t




























.. :_:. it would be held.
There is no question but that Carrier erred when it failed to .notify the Organization of the hearing. This:omission alone would constitute a basis for setting aside the disciplinary action in an appropriate situation. However, in this case, where the record clearly shows a pattern of unauthorized absences within a very short period of employment as well as a failure to appear at the scheduled hearing although the evidence indicates that claimant did receive notice .thereof, we are not persuaded that Carrier's decision should be reversed. Claimant was administered discipline on a reasonably progressive basis and there is no indication that any request was made for a new hearing or to present additional evidence. The claim will be denied on the specific facts as this case and not as a precedent.

AWARD:

Claim denied.

Adopted at Philadelphia, Pa., ill



Carrie-?-M mbe,

1979.

Harold M: West.r. Chairman

Employe Member