PUBLIC
LAW
BOARD NO.
2366
AWARD NO.
7
CASE NO. 12
CASE #1220 MW
FILE: SL-237-T-78
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company
and
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
"(1) The suspension of Trackman T. L. Mueller
from May 12,
1978
to August
19, 1978
was without
just and.sufficient cause:
(2) The charge shall be stricken from Claimant's
record and he shall be accorded the benefits of
Rule 33(i)."
OPINION OF BOARD
Claimant was notified of a formal investigation concerning an alleged insubordination for failure to attend
remedial safety instructions. Subsequent to the hearing
he was suspended for ninety (90) days.
Carrier instructed Claimant to attend a remedial safety
class on February 22,
1978. When he
failed to attend - or
notify Carrier of inability - he was charged.
Although Claimant raised certain objections (at the
hearing) to being required to attend because of his furloughed status (even though he had certain displacement rights)
he also asserted an inability to complete the trip because
his truck "broke down."
It may be that under certain circumstances a furloughed
employee does not owe the same degree of responsibility to
an employer.as does an active employee. But, we do not find
it necessary to decide that question which is much broader
than the one presented here. This Claimant was "bumped" on
February 13 and he had fifteen (15) days to exercise certain
options. fie was within that time frame when instructed to
report and'we feel that at that time - at the very least -
he was obligated to communicate to his employer a desire to
refrain from attending.
Even if. the Employee .experienced.automobile problems,
he was obligated to attempt to so notify the Carrier. fee
failed to do so.
A, ninety (90) day suspension may seem excessive at first.
glance; however a review of. Claimant's prior record suggests
that he has been disciplined previously - in a relatively
short career - for similar type offenses.
FINDINGS
The Board, upon consideration of the entire record and
all of the evidence finds:
' The parties herein are Carrier and Employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended.
This Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved '
herein.
The parties to said dispute were given due and proper
notice of hearing thereon.
' AWARD
Claim -denied.
v
1
J seph A. i tles
Chairm n and Neutral Memb r
1 ~r~'
t~I~
Hugh C(. Harpr IIichae7 J. Hagan
Organization Member Carrier Member
DATE
2_
'23~-,.;,~:,~,7