1. The sixty (60) day suspension assessed T. L. Story; the ten (10) .day suspension assessed J. K. Littrell; the fifteen (15i day suspension-assessed R. L. Snyder and the ten (10) day suspension assessed R. ~L..3e,S,nyder and the ten (10) day suspension assessed R. E. Little for allegedly failing to--the instructions of your supervisors 'and absenting yourselves without authority at approximately 3:30 p.m. on December' 29, 1983 was without just and sufficient cause, excessive and disparate discipline. (Organization File MW-38-=T-84; Carrier File 1630).
2. Each of the Claimants shall have his record cleared of the charge and shall be compensated all wage loss suffered."
The Claimants were notified of an investigation of a charge of failing to follow instructions and absence without authority. Subsequent to, the investigation, one Claimant was assessed a 60 day suspension, one was assessed a 15 day suspension and two were assessed 10 day suspensions.
The Carrier asserts that the four Employees refused to work in an emergency and left the premises without authority. The Carrier justifies the differences in the length of suspensions based upon a review of each Employee's individual prior record.
We have reviewed this record at length and find no basis to unduly lengthen this document. The record clearly shows that the Employees failed to follow instructions and left the premises for significant periods of time without permission. Moreover, we do not agree with the Claimants' assertion of disparate treatment since the variance in the
PLB-2366 -2- Award No. 77