PUBLIC. LAW BOARD v0. 2420
AWARD NO. 19
' DROTfiERH00D OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
CONSOLIDATED RAIL
CORPORATION
DOCKET NO. 427
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
(a) The Carrier violated the Rules agreement, effective
December 16; 1945, as amended, particularly by
Rules 5-A-1, 5-C-1, 5-E-1 and the Absenteeism
Agreement sof January 26, 1973, when if assessed
discipline of dismissal of M.W, Repairman David A.
Sampsel November 22, 1978.
(b) Claimant Sampsel's record be cleared of the charge
brought against him on October 13, 1978.
(c) Claimant Sampsel be restored to service with seniority and all other rights unimpaired and be compensated
for wage loss sustained in accordance with the previsions of
Rule
6-A-1(d), with benefits restored.
OPINION OF BOARD:
Claimant was tried on, found guilty of, and disciplined by
discharge for the following charges:
"1 - Failure to report for duty on your regular assignment
at 7:00 AM on September 28, 1978, and September 29,
1978.
2 - Engaging, abetting and participating in an unauthorized
work stoppage at Canton MW Shop at 4:10 PM on September
28, 1978.
3 - Threatening R. Campitella, Shop Engineer, with bodily
harm at the Main Entrance to Division Road at 4:10 PM
on September 28, 1978,°
'PL'a'2420 -2- AWARD NO. 19
The disciplinary termination was imposed on Claimant because
of his alleged participation in an illegal and unauthorized strike
at Carrier's Canton, Ohio, Maintenance of Way Shop on September 28
and 29, 1978 by members of Local 3050 of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees employed there.
We have described the general circumstances of this strike
and picketing situation revealed at the hearings thereon in our
previous Award No. 1, as well as. our opinions on certain procedural
and substantive questions raised by Organization there as well as here.
Turning to the particular facts of the instant situation,
the record shows:
1. Claimant, whose regular tour of duty as a repairman was
3s30 PM
to 12z00 Midnight at the Canton M.W. Shop, admittedly did no+_
report for duty on either September 28 or 29, 1978 while an unauthorized and illegal strike and picketing situation was going on by
members of Local 3050, B.M.W.F: at the Canton-Shop.
2. Testimony was given by Shop Engineer R. Campitella that
on September 28, 1978, he had been assigned by management to check
entrances to the shop and record the names of employees who were
congregated out there.
According to his further testimony,
Mr:
Campitella went to
the main entrance of the.shop to carry on this activity about
4:10 PM, when Claimant, one of.the group gathered there, approached
him, called him insulting names and used foul and abusive language
towards him, pointed his finger at him and stated, "We know where
you live and we will take care of you". As Campitella retreated
down the hill, Claimant followed him continuing his tirade
PLB 2420' -3- AWARD N0. 19
and threats.
3. Assistant Equipment Engineer. L. W. DuBois testified
that he was present at the same site at the same time, accompanying
Mr, Campitella. He corroborated Campitella's version of the
incident, stating further that when he and Campitella reached the
bottom of the hill, with Claimant still cursing Campitella with
foul
language, Claimant added to DuBois, "That goes for you too,.
Leo".
4. T. Martin, an M.W. Repairman at Canton, testified
that on September 28, 1978 he was with Claimant in the Hide-A-Way
Tavern,. located near the shop entrance from about 1:00 PM to about
8:00 PM. Mr. Martin added, however, that he did see Mr. Campitella
and Mr. DuBois at the Canton
shop
property entrance, but was not
asked and did not specify the time.
5. Claimant testified that he came to work at
his
regular
time for his 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM tour on September 28, 1978 but he
"couldn't get through" and although "no one advised me personally
to cross the picket line because I thought bodily harm would come
to me if I did and. I have a family; and that is why, mainly, I
didn't cross. I don't cross picket lines whether authorized or
unauthorized".
Claimant further testified that at a later time, which he
could not specifically identify except that it was not 5:10 PM
and that it was
dark, he
saw a friend's truck parked in the
vicinity of the shop entrance and walked across the street to
talk to this friend. He then saw Mr. Campitella and merely asked
him whether he had Claimant's name on his sheet. Nothing further
was said by either.
e
5
PLB 2420 -4- AWARD hO. 19
We conclude that Carrier had before it credible and con-
vincing evidence that Claimant was not only a striker and a
picketer in this illegal and unauthorized strike but that, in the
course of it, he was guilty of abusive and threatening behavior
towards a management representative, all justifying, in total,
forfeiture of further employment here.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
i
LOUIS Y OD%, CHAIRMAN S. N?EUTPAL
FRED WURP£L, JR., ORQA7vIZATIDI~ 2-: EMBER
.-- , _rG'K9_'L~
h'~: . . , -h
t. Gt(
MEMSM
DATED
P"~Y
._5
j