PUBLIC LAW BOARD No. 2420
AWARD N0. 27
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES
and
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION -.
DOCKET NO. 435
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS
(a) The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, affective
December 16, 1945, as amended, particularly
Rules 5-A-1, 5-C-1, 5-E-1 and the Absenteeism
Agreement of January 26, 1973, when it assessed
discipline of dismissal on Welder D. E. Mammone,
November 22, 1978.
(b)
Claimant Mammone's record be cleared of the charge
brought against him on October 13, 1978.
(c) Claimant Mammone be restored to service with seniority
and all other rights unimpaired and be compensated for
wage loss sustained in accordance with the provisions
of Rule 6-A-1(d) with benefits restored.
OPINION Or BOARD:
Claimant was tried on, found guilty of', and disciplined by
discharge for the following charges:
(1) "Failure to report for duty on your regular assign
ment at .7 :D0 AM, September 28, 1978 and September 29, 19? 8,
(2) "Engaging, abetting and participating in an unauthorized work stoppage at Canton MW Shop at Main EntranceDivision Road at 2:OOAM on September 29, 1978 at
Broadway Road Crossing at 4:05PM and 5i30PM on
September 29, 1978."
PLB 2420 -2- AWARD n0. 27
The disciplinary termination was imposed on Claimant
because of his alleged participation in an illegal and unauthorized
strike at Carrier's Canton, Ohio Maintenance of Way Shop on September 28 and 29, 1978 by members of Local 3050 of the Brotherhood
of Maintenance.of Way Employees employed there.
We have described the general circumstances of this strike
and picketing situation revealed at the hearings thereon, in our
previous Award No. 1 as well as our opinions on procedural and
substantive questions raised by Organization there as well as here.
Turning to the particular facts of the instant situation,
the record showss
1. It is not disputed that Claimant failed to appear for
work, on September 28 and 29, 1978 at the Carrier's Canton Maintenance
of Way Shop where he was employed as a welder with tour of duty
from 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM.
2. In his testimony, Claimant gave as his explanation for
not being at work on those days as following: When he appeared for
work on September 28 at the entrance to the plant property, he saw
a large group of his co-workers at the entrance with a strike sign,
"and I didn't want to go through them ... I don't know what they
were doing. They was honoring a. picket line. That is all I know";
or for September 29, assuming that the situation was the same, "I
didn't even show up that morning. I slept". He did not call in on
either day.
P1.3 2420 -3- AWARD NO. 27
3. Testimony by Equipment Engineer R.E. Brower was that he
-saw Claimant at approximately 2:15 AM on September 29 with six other
strikers at the main entrance to the Shop. This testimony was corroborated by that of Assistant Equipment Engineer H.F. Reedy, who had
accompanied Mr. Brower. According to Mr. Reedy, a strike sign was on
display where the group, including Claimant, was stationed.
4. Testimony was also given by Shop Engineer R. Campiteila
that on September 29, Claimant was among a group of strikers positioned at the Broadway Road entrance to the Canton M.W. Shop at
5:30 AM..
5. Claimant admitted that he was at the main entrance to
the Shop at approximately 2:00
AM
on September. 29 and at the Broadway
entrance at approximately 4:05 PM and 5:30 PM that same day. He explained the 2:00 AM appearance as due to the fact that he had been at
a night club, and after leaving it, came by with his girl friend to
find out whether there would be work that day or whether he could
sleep past starting time. In respect to the 4:05 PM appearance. he
was an his way to a new house that he had just bought and passed the
picketing group on the way. His attention was caught by the fact that
Mr. Campitelia and another individual were "giving out papers"
(evidently a reference to the distribution of copies of the court
injunction papers) and stopped merely to see what.was going on. He
did not accept one of the papers being issued. In respect to his
gL9 2420 -4- AWARD NO. 27
having been there at 5:30 PM, he stated that he might have been
there at that time rather than. at 4:05 PM.
6. Testimony was given by another employee of the Canton
M.W. Shop that, as-stated by Claimant, he saw the latter at a lounge
between midnight to about 1:30 AM on September 29, where the witness
played in the band. The witness further testified that Claimant
-gas accompanied at the lounge by a female companion and at about
2:00 AM,. when the witness left the lounge or bar, he saw Claimant
again with his companion "alone at the top of the hill" where the
main entrance to the Canton Shop. is located.
The evidence appears to us to show that, although one of the
illegal and unauthorized strikers, Claimant's participation in promoting or augmenting picketing activities appears to have been minimal
compared to others. We believe that his guilt in degree and kind of
the charges. on which he was tried. was such as to call for amendment
of the discharge penalty to one of a forty (40) days' suspension and
xe shall so award.
AWARD
Claimant's discharge shall be amended to a forty (403 days'
disciplinary suspension. He shall be reinstated to his former
position within thirty (30) days with restitution to him of lost
PLB 2420 -5m AWARD NO. 27
earnings for ail but the first forty (40) days immediately following
his dismissal.
LOUIS YA DA.
CHAIRMAN & NEUTRAL
FRED WURPEL, JR.,
ORGANIC
ION MEMBER
BERNER~,CARRIER MEMBER
:'RI
.t:. BERNEt7-; CARRIER MEMBER
DATED