PUBLIC LAW BOARD NO. 2439
Award No. 151
Case No. 151
PARTIES Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
_TO and
DISPUTE: Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Western Lines)
STATEMENT "That the Carrier violated the Current Agreement when it
OF CLAIM: dismissed Mr. R. M. Raynor from its service, said action being
excessive, unduly harsh and an abuse of discretion.
"That the Carrier reinstate Mr. R. M. Raynor to his former
Carrier position with seniority and all other rights restored
unimpaired, with pay for all loss of earnings suffered, and his
record cleared of all charges."
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are Carrier and Employees
within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board is duly constituted
under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.
Claimant entered Carrier's service on April 3, 1986. Subsequently he was furloughed. Upon being
recalled prior to returning to service from his furlough he was required to take a physical examination.
In the course of that physical examination he was found to test positive for cocaine. Subsequently a
formal hearing was held on April 24, 1987 and on the basis of the evidence adduced at the hearing
Carrier was convinced that Claimant was in violation of Rule G and was thereafter on May 11, 1987
dismissed from service.
An examination of the transcript on the investigation reveals that there was significant evidence based
on laboratory reports showing that the presence of cocaine had been confirmed. Further the record
indicates that since Claimant's dismissal in 1987 he has refused to participate in the Employee
Assistance Program. Participation in that Program might result in favorable consideration for
reinstatement by Carrier. In this instance his failure to participate in the Program negated that
possibility.
The investigation and the record herein reveals that there was no question but that Claimant was in
violation of Rule G based on the cocaine finding and therefore Carrier's conclusion to terminate him
was justified. The Claim must be denied.
ZN3a-rsl
3
AWARD
Claim denied.
r
I. M. Lieberman, Neutral-Cbairman
R. J. Stuart--Carrier Member C. F. Foose--Employe Member
San Francisco, California
August 3 / , 1989