,




PART-I-ES Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Western Lines)
DISPUTE: and


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS - -

Upon the whole record, after hearing, the Board finds that the liarties herein are Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that this Board is duly constituted under Public Law 89_456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.


Claimant had been employed by Carrier in 1974. He had baPit dismissed by Carrier in 1987 for violation of Rule 604, being absent without 111-oiler authority. This dismissal ultimately was progressed to this Board in Case N,3, 147, resulting in Award No. 147, dated January 10, 1989. That Award sustainu,l the claim, and Claimant was returned to service with all rights unimpaired anti received pay for wages lost in the amount of over $22,000. In accordance with (hat Award, by



/ property to discuss his reinstatement and also was scheduled to complete a return- -








3 riot incorrect or else Carrier was correct in its determination that it needed to discipline Claimant for what appeared to be a grievous case of misconduct. There is no doubt but that the hearing was properly conducted since there was evidence at the hearing that Claimant was notified of the hearing and simply did not appear, even though the notification was perfected. Under all the circumstances, and in view of the nature of the offense, which Claimant admitted by his guilty plea, Carrier was within its rights in dismissing Claimant. He did not attempt to avail himself of Carrier's Employee Assistance Program, as a first-time offender may well have done. In any event, it is apparent that there was a violation of Carrier's rules by Claimant, which could not go unnoticed, and therefore Carrier was justified in his dismissal.


AWARD

Claim denied.

LM, Lieberman, Neutral- Chairman

Employee Member

KIL. Joyner
Carrier Member

San Francisco, California
March 3 6 , 1993