PUBLIC LAW BOARD N0. 2439
Award No. 53
Case No. 53
PARTIES Brotherhood of-Maintenance of Way Employees
TO and
DISPUTE Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT "1. That the Carrier violated the provisions of the Agreement when
75F
CLAIM on April 16, 1981 it advised Track Foreman J.L. Mendoza to the
effect that as a result of a formal hearing held April 3, 1981
he was found to be in violation of Carrier's Rules 801 and 806
and for reasons thereof, he was disqualified in the class of
Extra Gang Foremen and Track Walker and his name was thereby
removed from the seniority roster in those classes, said disci
pline being excessive, unduly harsh and in abuse of discretion.
2. That Claimant J.L. Mendoza be returned to his proper position
as Track Foreman on Extra Gang No. 29 at Toledo, Oregon with
' all seniority rights restored unimpaired in the classes from
which disqualified, and that he be compensated the differential
between Track Laborer rate and that applicable to Track Foreman
for all time lost therefrom, as well as any and all expenses
incurred by him because of the Carrier's actions."
FINDINGS
Upon the whole record, after hearing, the Board finds that the parties herein are-Carrier and Employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, and that
this Board is duly constituted under Public Law 89-456 and has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.
In this matter Claimant, who held responsibility as a Track Forman and also as a Track
Walker, was charged with violation of Carrier's Rules 801 and 806 in that he was specifically accussed of selling used Carrier railroad cross ties without authorization and
keeping the money. Rule 801 provides, in pertinent part:
"Employees will not be retained in the service who are ...
dishonest ..."
Rule 806 provides, in pertinent part:
~U39-53
-2-
" .... property of the Company must not be sold ....except by
proper authority."
Following a hearing held on April 3, 1981, on April 16 the Claimant was disqualified
as an Extra Gang Foreman and as a Track Walker and his name was removed from the seniority rosters in those two classes. He was permitted to exercise his seniority as a
Track Laborer and continue his employment in that class with the Carrier.
The Carrier points out that the investigation revealed that Claimant had conducted
transactions involving selling of used railroad ties in the amount of twenty dollars,
$150 and $300. Although he reimbursed Carrier for these sums,' Carrier insists that
had he not been caught up in the investigation, he would have retained the money for
personal use. Hence, Carrier concludes that he was clearly guilty of the charges and
the discipline imposed was quite lenient since violation of the rules in the matter
involved in this dispute could result in dismissal.
The Organization insists that the discipline assessed in this dispute constituted an
excessive exercise of Carrier's authority and discretion. The Organization points out
that Claimant attempted to be cooperative with all involved in the investigation of
this matter and a disqualification constituted excessive discipline inasmuch as his
actions in this situation no way decreased his ability and knowledge to perform the
duties of Track Walker and Extra Gang Foreman. It is also clear, according to the
Organization, that Carrier did not establish clearly in the record sufficient evidence
to support its conclusion that the charges were proven against Claimant.
A review of the transcript of the investigation reveals that there was ample evidence
including Claimant's own admission to support Carrier's conclusion that he was guilty
of the charges. Under the circumstances, the discipline imposed cannot be considered
to be excessive. Dishonesty of the variety involved in this matter frequently results
in discharge. The claim must be denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
AWD. N0. 53
_3_ CASE N0. 53'
PLB-2439
.NI. Lieberman, Neutral-Chairman
L.C. Scherling, Carr)r Member S. . eming, Employee Mdmber
San Francisco, CA
July 1 , 1982